Publication:
Treatment of methamphetamine-induced psychosis: A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing haloperidol and quetiapine

dc.contributor.authorViroj Verachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorWarangkana Ruknganen_US
dc.contributor.authorKachornwan Chawanakrasaesinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSumnao Nilabanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomporn Suwanmajoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRossukon Thanateerabunjongen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaranit Kaewkungwalen_US
dc.contributor.authorRasmon Kalayasirien_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T03:11:33Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T03:11:33Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractRationale: To our knowledge, only a few double-blind randomized controlled trials with antipsychotic drugs have been conducted to examine the treatment of methamphetamine-induced psychosis (MAP). Objectives: The aims of this study are to compare the antipsychotic and adverse events of quetiapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug, to haloperidol, a standard treatment for primary psychotic disorder, in individuals with MAP. Methods: Eighty individuals with MAP were randomly assigned into two groups, i.e. treatment with quetiapine (n∈=∈36) and haloperidol (n∈=∈44). Sixty-eight patients (85 %) completed the study protocol, i.e. treatment with quetiapine at least 100 mg per day or haloperidol at least 2 mg per day orally once a day for 4 weeks. The doses were increased every 5 days until no psychotic symptom was observed from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Data were analysed by survival analysis with Cox's proportional regression analysis, general estimating equations and log-rank tests. Results: Thirty-two (89 %) subjects from the quetiapine group and 37 subjects (84 %) from the haloperidol group met the remission criteria at the end of the study. Baseline PANSS total scores of quetiapine and haloperidol groups were 82.4∈±∈16.6 and 90.0∈±∈18.4, respectively (mean∈±∈SD; p∈=∈0.06). The change-from-baseline scores were -47.8 for the quetiapine group and -53.2 for the haloperidol group. There were no significant differences between the antipsychotic effects (coefficient value∈=∈-2. 6, p∈=∈0.32, 95%CI∈=∈-7.6, 2.5) and the adverse effects of quetiapine and haloperidol. Conclusions: Quetiapine may be used as an antipsychotic treatment for MAP with comparable therapeutic effects and adverse events to treatment with classical antipsychotic drugs. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPsychopharmacology. Vol.231, No.16 (2014), 3099-3108en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00213-014-3485-6en_US
dc.identifier.issn14322072en_US
dc.identifier.issn00333158en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84904964172en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/34920
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904964172&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleTreatment of methamphetamine-induced psychosis: A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing haloperidol and quetiapineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904964172&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections