Publication:
Accuracy of Support-Vector Machines for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, Using Volume of Brain Obtained by Structural MRI at Siriraj Hospital

dc.contributor.authorYudthaphon Vichianinen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnutr Khummongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorPipat Chiewviten_US
dc.contributor.authorAtthapon Raksthaputen_US
dc.contributor.authorSunisa Chaichanetteeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNuttapol Aoonkaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorVorapun Senanarongen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:24:13Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:24:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-10en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The determination of brain volumes using visual ratings is associated with an inherently low accuracy for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A support-vector machine (SVM) is one of the machine learning techniques, which may be utilized as a classifier for various classification problems. This study exploratorily investigated the accuracy of SVM classification models for AD subjects using brain volume and various clinical data as features. Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective chart review. A total of 201 eligible subjects were recruited from the Memory Clinic at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Eighteen cases were excluded due to incomplete MRI data. Subjects were randomly assigned to a training group (AD = 46, normal = 46) and testing group (AD = 45, normal = 46) for SVM modeling and validation, respectively. The results in terms of accuracy and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis are reported. Results: The highest accuracy for brain volumetry (62.64%) was found using the hippocampus as a single feature. A combination of clinical parameters as features provided accuracy ranging between 83 and 90%. However, a combination of brain volumetry and clinical parameters as features to the SVM models did not improve the accuracy of the result. Conclusions: In our study, the use of brain volumetry as SVM features provided low classification accuracy with the highest accuracy of 62.64% using the hippocampus volume alone. In contrast, the use of clinical parameters [Thai mental state examination score, controlled oral word association tests (animals; and letters K, S, and P), learning memory, clock-drawing test, and construction-praxis] as features for SVM models provided good accuracy between 83 and 90%.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Neurology. Vol.12, (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fneur.2021.640696en_US
dc.identifier.issn16642295en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85107219348en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78206
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107219348&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of Support-Vector Machines for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, Using Volume of Brain Obtained by Structural MRI at Siriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107219348&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections