Publication:
Prospective comparison of transient elastography, point shear wave elastography, APRI and FIB-4 for staging liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis

dc.contributor.authorProwpanga Udompapen_US
dc.contributor.authorKamonthip Sukonruten_US
dc.contributor.authorVoraparee Suvannarergen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnanya Pongpaibulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhunchai Charatcharoenwitthayaen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Minnesota Twin Citiesen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:03:32Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:03:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Ultrasound-based elastography and serum indexes have been individually validated as noninvasive methods for staging liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. We aimed to compare the accuracy of transient elastography (TE), shear wave elastography (SWE), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) with the METAVIR liver fibrosis staging in viral hepatitis patients. We enrolled 121 treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B and C monoinfected patients. All underwent liver biopsy had biochemistry tests and liver stiffness measurements by TE using M and XL probes followed by point SWE performed on the same day. The accuracy of each method for predicting different fibrosis stages was demonstrated as an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. The AUROCs of TE using M and XL probes, SWE, APRI and FIB-4 were 0.771, 0.761, 0.700, 0.698 and 0.697, respectively, for significant fibrosis; 0.974, 0.973, 0.929, 0.738 and 0.859, respectively, for advanced fibrosis; and 0.954, 0.949, 0.962, 0.765 and 0.962, respectively, for cirrhosis. TE using the M probe was comparable to the XL probe in detecting all fibrosis stages. TE was superior to SWE for assessing significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis. For cirrhosis, the performances of TE, SWE and FIB-4 were similar. APRI was least accurate in liver fibrosis staging. To conclude, for patients with viral hepatitis, TE using either M or XL probe is an effective noninvasive test for assessing liver fibrosis, particularly advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, while SWE and FIB-4 possess an excellent accuracy in predicting cirrhosis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Viral Hepatitis. (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jvh.13246en_US
dc.identifier.issn13652893en_US
dc.identifier.issn13520504en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85076883673en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51125
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076883673&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleProspective comparison of transient elastography, point shear wave elastography, APRI and FIB-4 for staging liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076883673&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections