Publication:
Role of Parallel Solenoidal Electric Field on Energy Conversion in 2.5D Decaying Turbulence with a Guide Magnetic Field

dc.contributor.authorPeera Pongkitiwanichakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid Ruffoloen_US
dc.contributor.authorFan Guoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSenbei Duen_US
dc.contributor.authorPiyawat Suetrongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChutima Yannawaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKirit Makwanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittipat Malakiten_US
dc.contributor.otherIndian Institute of Technology Hyderabaden_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThammasat Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherLos Alamos National Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.otherNew Mexico Consortiumen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:31:54Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:31:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-20en_US
dc.description.abstractWe perform 2.5D particle-in-cell simulations of decaying turbulence in the presence of a guide (out-of-plane) background magnetic field. The fluctuating magnetic field initially consists of Fourier modes at low wavenumbers (long wavelengths). With time, the electromagnetic energy is converted to plasma kinetic energy (bulk flow+thermal energy) at the rate per unit volume of J · E for current density J and electric field E . Such decaying turbulence is well known to evolve toward a state with strongly intermittent plasma current. Here we decompose the electric field into components that are irrotational, E ir, and solenoidal (divergence-free), E so. E ir is associated with charge separation, and J · E ir is a rate of energy transfer between ions and electrons with little net change in plasma kinetic energy. Therefore, the net rate of conversion of electromagnetic energy to plasma kinetic energy is strongly dominated by J · E so, and for a strong guide magnetic field, this mainly involves the component E so,∥ parallel to the total magnetic field B . We examine various indicators of the spatial distribution of the energy transfer rate J ∥ · E so,∥, which relates to magnetic reconnection, the best of which are (1) the ratio of the out-of-plane electric field to the in-plane magnetic field, (2) the out-of-plane component of the nonideal electric field, and (3) the magnitude of the estimate of current helicityen_US
dc.identifier.citationAstrophysical Journal. Vol.923, No.2 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3847/1538-4357/ac2f45en_US
dc.identifier.issn15384357en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004637Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85122941249en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76837
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122941249&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEarth and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleRole of Parallel Solenoidal Electric Field on Energy Conversion in 2.5D Decaying Turbulence with a Guide Magnetic Fielden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85122941249&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections