Publication:
Survey of respiratory support for intensive care patients in 10 tertiary hospital of Thailand

dc.contributor.authorKaweesak Chittawatanaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorKanwan Jaikriengkraien_US
dc.contributor.authorChairat Permpikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChairat Permpikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorOnuma Chaiwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSuneerat Kongsayreepongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPuttipunnee Vorrakitpokatornen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarakarn Wilaichoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorThananchai Bunburaphongen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanwimol Saengchoteen_US
dc.contributor.authorSunthiti Morakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorThammasak Thawitsrien_US
dc.contributor.authorChanchai Sitthipanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanna Sombunvibulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhornlert Chatrkawen_US
dc.contributor.authorSahadol Poonyathawonen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnan Watanathumen_US
dc.contributor.authorPusit Fuengfooen_US
dc.contributor.authorDusit Satawornen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdisorn Wongsaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKunchit Piyavechviratanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthat Rungruanghiranyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChaichan Pothiraten_US
dc.contributor.authorAttawut Deesomchoken_US
dc.contributor.authorBoonsong Patjanasoontornen_US
dc.contributor.authorRungsun Bhurayanontachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorRatapum Champunuten_US
dc.contributor.authorNorawee Chuachamsaien_US
dc.contributor.authorChaweewan Thongchaien_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPhramongkutklao College of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMRH Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMaharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSrinagarind hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Songkha Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherBuddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrapokklao Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T03:05:31Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T03:05:31Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: There are varieties of clinical practices for intensive care respiratory support. However, there has been no published report characterizing its current practice in Thailand. The present study was undertaken to characterize the practice of respiratory support for intensive care patients in Thai tertiary hospitals. Material and Method: A cross-sectional survey and retrospective historical cohort of intensive care units (ICUs) was performed on May 30, 2011 from ten tertiary hospitals in Thailand. The participating ICUs were asked to complete the following data of all patients who were mechanically ventilated in the ICUs: Demographic data, characteristics of respiratory support, ICU type, causes of respiratory failure, and weaning technique. Results: A total of 258 patients from ten tertiary hospitals were included and analyzed. The medical ICU patients remained in the ICU significantly longer than patients in other ICUs. Patients in surgical ICUs were significantly younger than patients in other ICUs. The prevalence of mechanically ventilated patients in this survey was 64.7% with a significantly higher proportion in the medical ICUs. The median of ventilator days was also significantly higher in the medical ICUs. An invasive ventilator was more commonly used in all ICUs rather than non-invasive ventilators. The three common causes of respiratory support were severe sepsis or septic shock, respiratory failure and post-operation, respectively. Volume-controlled continuous mandatory ventilation (VC-CMV) ventilation was more commonly used as the initial mode of ventilation in both surgical and medical ICUs. The maximum plateau pressure was significantly higher in the medical ICU patients but there were no differences in maximum tidal volume and PEEP level. One-third of the patients were in the weaning process, mostly in the medical ICUs. Pressure support was the predominant weaning mode in the medical ICUs, while synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) was more predominant in the surgical ICUs. Protocol-based weaning was used in approximately two-thirds of patients who were in the weaning process. With repeated estimation equation logistic model and left censors' cohort to 28 days, the medical ICUs had significantly lower ventilator free overtime individual patients when compared with surgical ICUs, while there was no difference within mixed ICUs. Conclusion: The VC-CMV was more commonly used as the initial mode of ventilation in both surgical and medical ICUs. Pressure support was the predominant weaning mode in the medical ICUs, while SIMV was more predominant in the surgical ICUs. Individual patients in medical ICU had a greater number of ventilator days and less probability of being ventilatorfree.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.97, No.1 SUPPL. 1 (2014)en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84902335887en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/34856
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902335887&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSurvey of respiratory support for intensive care patients in 10 tertiary hospital of Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902335887&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections