Publication:
A comparative study of the extra-intraoral landmark technique and the direct technique for inferior alveolar nerve block

dc.contributor.authorAurasa Waikakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirapun Punwutikornen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-10T08:31:36Z
dc.date.available2018-08-10T08:31:36Z
dc.date.issued1991-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractCurrently, the inferior alveolar nerve block is sometimes ineffective for a number of reasons. The extra-intraoral landmark technique (EIL technique) was modified and compared in effectiveness with the direct technique in patients undergoing inferior alveolar nerve block. The results showed that the success rates of the EIL technique based on both subjective and objective responses were significantly greater than those of the direct technique. The EIL technique also resulted in significantly less pain from the injection than the direct technique. © 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol.49, No.8 (1991), 804-808en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0278-2391(91)90006-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn02782391en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0025861653en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/22030
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0025861653&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of the extra-intraoral landmark technique and the direct technique for inferior alveolar nerve blocken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0025861653&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections