Publication:
Evaluation of removal efficiency of human antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants in Bangkok, Thailand

dc.contributor.authorDonwichai Sinthuchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwanna Kitpati Boontanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarin Boontanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorChongrak Polpraserten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Environment and Resource Studies, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThammasat Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:54:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:01:34Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:54:24Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:01:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© IWA Publishing 2016. This study aimed to investigate the antibiotic concentration at each stage of treatment and to evaluate the removal efficiency of antibiotics in different types of secondary and advanced treatment, as well as the effects of the location of their discharge points on the occurrence of antibiotics in surface water. Eight target antibiotics and four hospital wastewater treatment plants in Bangkok with different conventional and advanced treatment options were investigated. Antibiotics were extracted by solid phase extraction and analysed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The antibiotic with the highest concentration at influent was cefazolin at 13,166 ng/L, while the antibiotic with the highest concentration at effluent was sulfamethoxazole at 1,499 ng/L. The removal efficiency of antibiotics from lowest to highest was sulfamethoxazole, piperacillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, dicloxacillin, ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, and cefalexin. The adopted conventional treatment systems could not completely remove all antibiotics from wastewater. However, using advanced treatments or disinfection units such as chlorination and UV could increase the antibiotic removal efficiency. Chlorination was more effective than UV, ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole concentration fluctuated during the treatment process, and sulfamethoxazole was the most difficult to remove. Both these antibiotics should be studied further regarding their contamination in sludge and suitable treatment options for their removal.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWater Science and Technology. Vol.73, No.1 (2016), 182-191en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2166/wst.2015.484en_US
dc.identifier.issn02731223en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84954524355en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/40687
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84954524355&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of removal efficiency of human antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants in Bangkok, Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84954524355&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections