Publication:
Comparison of the effects of UV-A radiation on Leptospira interrogan serovar Bataviae, Canicola and Pomona

dc.contributor.authorSudarat Chadsuthien_US
dc.contributor.authorJirasak Wong-Ekkabuten_US
dc.contributor.authorWannapong Triampoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGalayanee Doungchaweeen_US
dc.contributor.authorDarapond Triampoen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSouth Carolina Commission on Higher Educationen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T08:38:48Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T08:38:48Z
dc.date.issued2010-05-24en_US
dc.description.abstractMotivated by the lack of related studies and an insufficient understanding of the response of pathogenic spirochetes, including leptospira to ultraviolet-A (UV-A) (or other stresses), we comparatively studied the effects of UV-A radiation on the Leptospira interrogans serovar Bataviae, Canicola and Pomona. The main purpose of this work was to investigate the effects of UV-A irradiation-both short term (immediate) and long term (post-irradiation)-on leptospires at different UV-A dosages, controlled by the duration of exposure time. It was observed that survival fractions linearly decrease from 100 to about 70, 60 and 50% for serovar Pomona, Bataviae and Canicola, respectively. This indicates that, for different serovars, UV-A irradiation has a quantitatively different effects on growth. Short term effects suggest that Pomona may be more resistant to UV-A than the other serovars. Long term effects show that, when compared with the control group, the treated groups of bacteria re-grow when the exposure time is equal or lesser than 6 h (~ 2-6), while the groups exposed for 12 h or longer experienced little change or a slight decrease. This may indicate that UV-A radiation is able to inhibit the growth of bacteria, but does not prevent self-defense from taking place. UV-A radiation's effect on antigenic components was also investigated. The immunoblotting method was used and the results are supported by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results. Possible explanations for these results are discussed. © 2010 Academic Journals.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAfrican Journal of Biotechnology. Vol.9, No.21 (2010), 3196-3206en_US
dc.identifier.issn16845315en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-77958133220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/28502
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958133220&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effects of UV-A radiation on Leptospira interrogan serovar Bataviae, Canicola and Pomonaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958133220&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections