Publication:
Prediction of percentage body fat in rural Thai population using simple anthropometric measurements

dc.contributor.authorChatlert Pongchaiyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorVongsvat Kosulwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorNipa Rojroongwasinkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsri Charoenkiatkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaewjai Thepsuthammaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorMalinee Laopaiboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorTuan V. Nguyenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRajata Rajatanavinen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherGarvan Institute of Medical Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Australiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:07:13Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:07:13Z
dc.date.issued2005-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To develop and validate sex-specific equations for predicting percentage body fat (%BF) in rural Thai population, based on BMI and anthropometric measurements. Research Methods and Procedures: %BF (DXA; GE Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) was measured in 181 men and 255 women who were healthy and between 20 and 84 years old. Anthropometric measures such as weight (kilograms), height (centimeters), BMI (kilograms per meter squared), waist circumference (centimeters), hip circumference (centimeters), thickness at triceps skinfold (millimeters), biceps skinfold (millimeters), subscapular skinfold (millimeters), and suprailiac skinfold (millimeters) were also measured. The sample was randomly divided into a development group (98 men and 125 women) and a validation group (83 men and 130 women). Regression equations of %BF derived from the development group were then evaluated for accuracy in the validation group. Results: The equation for estimating %BF in men was: %BF(men) = 0.42 X subscapular skinfold + 0.62 X BMI - 0.28 X biceps skinfold + 0.17 X waist circumference -18.47, and in women: %BF(women) = 0.42 X hip circumference + 0.17 X suprailiac skinfold + 0.46 X BMI -23.75. The coefficient of determination (R2) for both equations was 0.68. Without anthropometric variables, the predictive equation using BMI, age, and sex was: %BF = 1.65 X BMI + 0.06 X age - 15.3 X sex - 10.67 (where sex = 1 for men and sex = 0 for women), with R2= 0.83. When these equations were applied to the validation sample, the difference between measured and predicted %BF ranged between ±9%, and the positive predictive values were above 0.9. Discussion: These results suggest that simple, noninvasive, and inexpensive anthropometric variables may provide an accurate estimate of %BF and could potentially aid the diagnosis of obesity in rural Thais. Copyright © 2005 NAASO.en_US
dc.identifier.citationObesity Research. Vol.13, No.4 (2005), 729-738en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/oby.2005.82en_US
dc.identifier.issn10717323en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-32844469828en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/16247
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=32844469828&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePrediction of percentage body fat in rural Thai population using simple anthropometric measurementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=32844469828&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections