Publication:
Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient-controlled analgesia, intramuscular q.i.d. injection and p.r.n. injection for postoperative pain relief

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorV. Sanansilpen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Lertakyamaneeen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Udompunturaken_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-04T06:56:29Z
dc.date.available2018-07-04T06:56:29Z
dc.date.issued1995-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractWe conclude that the intravenous PCA method is a cost-effective technique. Although the PCA device is expensive, the cost-effectiveness analysis should give explicit figures for physicians and the hospital administrators to decide whether they should use the PCA instead of the conventional method.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.78, No.11 (1995), 600-604en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0029587409en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/17375
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029587409&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCost-effectiveness analysis of patient-controlled analgesia, intramuscular q.i.d. injection and p.r.n. injection for postoperative pain reliefen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0029587409&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections

Scopus 1991-2000