Publication:
Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence in Maela refugee camp on the Thai-Myanmar border: A clinical report

dc.contributor.authorMary Ellen Gilderen_US
dc.contributor.authorThet Wai Zinen_US
dc.contributor.authorNan San Waien_US
dc.contributor.authorMa Neren_US
dc.contributor.authorPaw Si Sayen_US
dc.contributor.authorMyint Htooen_US
dc.contributor.authorSay Sayen_US
dc.contributor.authorWin Win Htayen_US
dc.contributor.authorJulie A. Simpsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSasithon Pukrittayakameeen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancois Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRose McGreadyen_US
dc.contributor.otherShoklo Malaria Research Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Melbourneen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T02:54:20Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T02:54:20Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Individuals in conflict-affected areas rarely get appropriate care for chronic or non-infectious diseases. The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing worldwide, and new evidence shows conclusively that the negative effects of hyperglycemia occur even at mild glucose elevations and that these negative effects can be attenuated by treatment. Scientific literature on gestational diabetes in refugee camp settings is critically limited. Methods: A 75 g 2-hour glucose tolerance test was administered to 228 women attending the antenatal care (ANC) clinic in Maela refugee camp on the Thai-Myanmar border. Prevalence of GDM was determined using the HAPO trial cut-offs [≥92 mg/dL (fasting),≥180 (1 hour), and≥153 (2 hour)] and the WHO criteria [≥126 mg/dL (fasting), and 140 mg/dL (2 hour)]. Results: From July 2011 to March 2012, the prevalence of GDM was 10.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.2-14.0] when the cut-offdetermined by the HAPO trial was applied. Applying the older WHO criteria yielded a prevalence of 6.6% (95% CI 3.3-9.8). Age, parity, and BMI emerged as characteristics that may be significantly associated with GDM in this population. Other risk factors that are commonly used in screening guidelines were not applicable in this diabetes-nai{dotless} ̈ve population. Discussion: The prevalence of GDM is lower in this population compared with other populations, but still complicates 10% of pregnancies. New evidence regarding gestational diabetes raises new dilemmas for health- care providers in resource-poor settings. Efforts to identify and treat patients at risk for adverse outcomes need to be balanced with awareness of the risks and burdens associated with over diagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Screening approaches based on risk factors or using higher cut-offvalues may help minimize this burden and identify those most likely to benefit from intervention.en_US
dc.identifier.citationGlobal Health Action. Vol.7, No.1 (2014)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3402/gha.v7.23887en_US
dc.identifier.issn16549880en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84904300755en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/34637
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904300755&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleGestational diabetes mellitus prevalence in Maela refugee camp on the Thai-Myanmar border: A clinical reporten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904300755&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections