Publication:
An efficient virus concentration method and RT-nested PCR for detection of rotaviruses in environmental water samples

dc.contributor.authorLeera Kittigulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSom Ekchaloemkieten_US
dc.contributor.authorFuangfa Utrarachkijen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanokrat Siripanichgonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDusit Sujiraraten_US
dc.contributor.authorSupornvit Pungchittonen_US
dc.contributor.authorAugsana Boonthumen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:16:45Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:16:45Z
dc.date.issued2005-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstractWater samples were concentrated by the modified adsorption-elution technique followed by speedVac reconcentration of the filter eluates. Reverse transcriptase-nested polymerase chain reaction (RT-nested PCR) was used to detect rotavirus RNA in concentrates of the water. The detection limit of the rotavirus determined by RT-nested PCR alone was about 1.67 plaque forming units (PFU) per RT-PCR assay and that by RT-nested PCR combined with concentration from 1 l seeded tap water sample was 1.46 plaque forming units per assay. Water samples were collected from various sources, concentrated, and determined rotavirus RNA. Of 120 water samples, rotavirus RNA was detected in 20 samples (16.7%); 2/10 (20%) of the river samples, 8/30 (26.7%) of the canal samples, and 10/40 (25%) of the sewage samples but was not found in any tap water samples (0/40). Only three water samples were positive for rotavirus antigen determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Alignment analysis of the sequenced PCR product (346-bp fragment) was performed in eight rotavirus-positive samples using the rotavirus sequence deposited in the GenBank. All samples gave the correct VP7 sequence. Results of analysis showed two samples similar to human rotavirus (97-98%), five similar to rotavirus G9 sequence (94-99%), and one sample similar to animal rotavirus (97%). PCR inhibitors were not observed in any concentrated water samples. In all 20 (of 120) samples where rotaviruses were found, fecal coliforms including Escherichia coli were also found, but of the samples testing negative for rotaviruses, 76 were fecal coliforms positive and 69 were E. coli positive. The combination of the virus concentration method and RT-nested PCR described below made it possible to effectively detect rotaviruses in environmental water samples. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Virological Methods. Vol.124, No.1-2 (2005), 117-122en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.11.013en_US
dc.identifier.issn01660934en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-12344258804en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/16603
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=12344258804&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.titleAn efficient virus concentration method and RT-nested PCR for detection of rotaviruses in environmental water samplesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=12344258804&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections