Publication:
The cost-effectiveness of the use of selective media for the diagnosis of melioidosis in different settings

dc.contributor.authorDavid A.B. Danceen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsavanh Sihalathen_US
dc.contributor.authorKolthida Rithen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmphone Sengdouangphachanhen_US
dc.contributor.authorManophab Luangrajen_US
dc.contributor.authorManivanh Vongsouvathen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul N. Newtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoel Lubellen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul Turneren_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahosot Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherAngkor Hospital for Childrenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:43:24Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:43:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 Dance et al. Background: Melioidosis is a frequently fatal disease requiring specific treatment. The yield of Burkholderia pseudomallei from sites with a normal flora is increased by culture using selective, differential media such as Ashdown’s agar and selective broth. However, since melioidosis mainly affects people in resource-poor countries, the cost effectiveness of selective culture has been questioned. We therefore retrospectively evaluated this in two laboratories in southeast Asia. Methodology/Principal findings: The results of all cultures in the microbiology laboratories of Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos and Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia, in 2017 were reviewed. We identified patients with melioidosis who were only diagnosed as a result of culture of non-sterile sites and established the total number of such samples cultured using selective media and the associated costs in each laboratory. We then conducted a rudimentary cost-effectiveness analysis by determining the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per DALY averted and compared this against the 2017 GDP per capita in each country. Overall, 29 patients in Vientiane and 9 in Siem Reap (20% and 16.9% of all culture-positive patients respectively) would not have been diagnosed without the use of selective media, the majority of whom (18 and 8 respectively) were diagnosed by throat swab culture. The cost per additional patient detected by selective culture was approximately $100 in Vientiane and $39 in Siem Reap. Despite the different patient populations (all ages in Vientiane vs. only children in Siem Reap) and testing strategies (all samples in Vientiane vs. based on clinical suspicion in Siem Reap), selective B. pseudomallei culture proved highly cost effective in both settings, with an ICER of ~$170 and ~$28 in Vientiane and Siem Reap, respectively. Conclusions/Significance: Selective culture for B. pseudomallei should be considered by all laboratories in melioidosis-endemic areas. However, the appropriate strategy for implementation should be decided locally.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Vol.13, No.7 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pntd.0007598en_US
dc.identifier.issn19352735en_US
dc.identifier.issn19352727en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85070659576en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51575
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070659576&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe cost-effectiveness of the use of selective media for the diagnosis of melioidosis in different settingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070659576&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections