Publication: Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, cirrus optical coherence tomography, and pentacam scheimpflug camera tomography
Issued Date
2018-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
11775483
11775467
11775467
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85057721341
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Clinical Ophthalmology. Vol.12, (2018), 1865-1873
Suggested Citation
Nida Wongchaisuwat, Ankana Metheetrairat, Pratuangsri Chonpimai, Waree Nujoi, Pinnita Prabhasawat Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, cirrus optical coherence tomography, and pentacam scheimpflug camera tomography. Clinical Ophthalmology. Vol.12, (2018), 1865-1873. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S172159 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/47053
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography, cirrus optical coherence tomography, and pentacam scheimpflug camera tomography
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018 Wongchaisuwat et al. Purpose: To compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements in subjects with corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, Visante anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (OCT), Cirrus OCT, and Pentacam Scheimpflug camera tomography. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study included 46 eyes of 33 patients with corneal edema and a CCT exceeding 550 μm evaluated by ultrasound pachymetry, Visante OCT, Cirrus OCT, and Pentacam. Two observers measured each eye twice. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility were determined and agreement among the devices calculated. Results: CCT was measured in 40 eyes of 29 patients. Regardless of the CCT, the measurements obtained using Visante OCT, Cirrus CCT, and ultrasound pachymetry were well correlated. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility were high among the three devices. Pentacam overestimated the results compared with the other devices, and ultrasound pachymetry was unmeasurable in six (13%) eyes with very thick and opaque corneas. In eyes with mild corneal edema (CCT 551–650 μm), measurements from the four devices were comparable. Conclusion: All devices reliably measured the CCT,650 μm. In eyes with edema exceeding 650 μm, CCT measurements from the Visante OCT, Cirrus OCT, and ultrasound pachymetry devices showed good reproducibility and were well correlated, while the Pentacam overestimated the values compared to the other devices. Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry should not be used in eyes with extreme corneal edema and opacity.