Publication: A robust design for identification of the Parasite Clearance Estimator
Issued Date
2013-11-18
Resource Type
ISSN
14752875
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84887344885
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Malaria Journal. Vol.12, No.1 (2013)
Suggested Citation
Kris M. Jamsen, Stephen B. Duffull, Joel Tarning, Ric N. Price, Julie A. Simpson A robust design for identification of the Parasite Clearance Estimator. Malaria Journal. Vol.12, No.1 (2013). doi:10.1186/1475-2875-12-410 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/31837
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A robust design for identification of the Parasite Clearance Estimator
Abstract
Background: Anti-malarial efficacy needs to be monitored continually to ensure optimal dosing in the face of emerging anti-malarial drug resistance. The efficacy of artemisinin based combination therapies (ACT) is assessed by repeated measurements of parasite density in the blood of patients following treatment. Parasite density is measured from a capillary or venous blood sample, but this can be logistically and ethically challenging if multiple samples are required within a short time period. The aim of this work was to apply optimal design theory to derive clinically feasible blood sampling schedules from which parasite clearance could be defined using the Parasite Clearance Estimator (PCE), a recently developed tool to identify and quantify artemisinin resistance. Methods. Robust T-optimal design methodology was applied to offer a sampling schedule that allows for discrimination across models that best describe an individual patient's parasite-time profile. The design was based on typical parasite-time profiles derived from the literature combined with key sampling constraints of no more than six samples per patient within 48 hours of initial treatment. The design was evaluated with a simulation-estimation procedure that implemented the PCE. Results: The optimal sampling times (sampling windows) were: 0 (0 to 1.1), 5.8 (4.0 to 6.0), 9.9 (8.4 to 11.5), 24.8 (24.0 to 24.9), 36.3 (34.8 to 37.2) and 48 (47.3, 48.0) hours post initial treatment. The simulation-estimation procedure showed that the design supported identification of the appropriate method by the PCE to determine an individual's parasite clearance rate constant (the main output calculation from the PCE). Conclusions: The proposed sampling design requires six samples per patient within the first 48 hours. The derived design requires validation in a real world setting, but should be considered for future studies that intend to employ the PCE. © 2013 Jamsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.