Publication: Zika virus isolation, propagation, and quantification using multiple methods
dc.contributor.author | Worawat Dangsagul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kriengsak Ruchusatsawat | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Apiwat Tawatsin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Don Changsom | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pirom Noisumdaeng | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sukontip Putchakarn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chayawat Phatihattakorn | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Prasert Auewarakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pilaipan Puthavathana | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Siriraj Hospital | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Thailand Ministry of Public Health | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Thammasat University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-04T11:40:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-04T11:40:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-07-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Zika virus (ZIKV) was isolated from the archival urine, serum, and autopsy specimens by intrathoracic inoculation of Toxorhynchitis splendens and followed by three blind sub-passaging in C6/36 mosquito cells. The virus isolates were identified using an immunofluorescence assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR). This study analyzed 11 ZIKV isolates. One isolate (0.6%) was obtained from 171 urine samples, eight (8.7%) from 92 serum samples and two from tissues of an abortive fetus. After propagation in C6/36 cells, ZIKV was titrated by plaque and focus forming unit (FFU) assays in Vero cell monolayers, and viral genomes were determined via real-time and digital RT-PCR. Plaque and FFU assay quantitations were comparable, with the amount of infectious viruses averaging 106−107 PFU or FFU/ml. Real-time RT-PCR semi-quantified the viral genome numbers, with Ct values varying from 12 to 14. Digital RT-PCR, which precisely determines the numbers of the viral genomes, consistently averaged 10-100 times higher than the number of infectious units. There was good correlation between the results of these titration methods. Therefore, the selection of a method should be based on the objectives of each research studies. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | PLoS ONE. Vol.16, No.7 July (2021) | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0255314 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 19326203 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85111766347 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/79332 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111766347&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Multidisciplinary | en_US |
dc.title | Zika virus isolation, propagation, and quantification using multiple methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111766347&origin=inward | en_US |