Publication:
Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial

dc.contributor.authorBarton F. Haynesen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter B. Gilberten_US
dc.contributor.authorM. Juliana McElrathen_US
dc.contributor.authorSusan Zolla-Pazneren_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorgia D. Tomarasen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Munir Alamen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid T. Evansen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid C. Montefiorien_US
dc.contributor.authorChitraporn Karnasutaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuengpueng Sutthenten_US
dc.contributor.authorHua Xin Liaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnthony L. DeVicoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge K. Lewisen_US
dc.contributor.authorConstance Williamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbraham Pinteren_US
dc.contributor.authorYouyi Fongen_US
dc.contributor.authorHolly Janesen_US
dc.contributor.authorAllan DeCampen_US
dc.contributor.authorYunda Huangen_US
dc.contributor.authorMangala Raoen_US
dc.contributor.authorErik Billingsen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicos Karasavvasen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerlin L. Robben_US
dc.contributor.authorViseth Ngauyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark S. De Souzaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert Parisen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuido Ferrarien_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert T. Baileren_US
dc.contributor.authorKelly A. Soderbergen_US
dc.contributor.authorCharla Andrewsen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhillip W. Bermanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicole Frahmen_US
dc.contributor.authorStephen C. De Rosaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael D. Alperten_US
dc.contributor.authorNicole L. Yatesen_US
dc.contributor.authorXiaoying Shenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard A. Koupen_US
dc.contributor.authorPunnee Pitisuttithumen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaranit Kaewkungwalen_US
dc.contributor.authorSorachai Nitayaphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupachai Rerks-Ngarmen_US
dc.contributor.authorNelson L. Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorJerome H. Kimen_US
dc.contributor.otherDuke University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherNYU School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard Medical Schoolen_US
dc.contributor.otherWalter Reed Army Institute of Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseasesen_US
dc.contributor.otherArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Thailanden_US
dc.contributor.otherRoyal Thai Armyen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Santa Cruzen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Maryland School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherRutgers New Jersey Medical Schoolen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T05:12:42Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T05:12:42Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-05en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In the RV144 trial, the estimated efficacy of a vaccine regimen against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) was 31.2%. We performed a case-control analysis to identify antibody and cellular immune correlates of infection risk. METHODS: In pilot studies conducted with RV144 blood samples, 17 antibody or cellular assays met prespecified criteria, of which 6 were chosen for primary analysis to determine the roles of T-cell, IgG antibody, and IgA antibody responses in the modulation of infection risk. Assays were performed on samples from 41 vaccinees who became infected and 205 uninfected vaccinees, obtained 2 weeks after final immunization, to evaluate whether immune-response variables predicted HIV-1 infection through 42 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Of six primary variables, two correlated significantly with infection risk: the binding of IgG antibodies to variable regions 1 and 2 (V1V2) of HIV-1 envelope proteins (Env) correlated inversely with the rate of HIV-1 infection (estimated odds ratio, 0.57 per 1-SD increase; P = 0.02; q = 0.08), and the binding of plasma IgA antibodies to Env correlated directly with the rate of infection (estimated odds ratio, 1.54 per 1-SD increase; P = 0.03; q = 0.08). Neither low levels of V1V2 antibodies nor high levels of Env-specific IgA antibodies were associated with higher rates of infection than were found in the placebo group. Secondary analyses suggested that Envspecific IgA antibodies may mitigate the effects of potentially protective antibodies. CONCLUSIONS:This immune-correlates study generated the hypotheses that V1V2 antibodies may have contributed to protection against HIV-1 infection, whereas high levels of Envspecific IgA antibodies may have mitigated the effects of protective antibodies. Vaccines that are designed to induce higher levels of V1V2 antibodies and lower levels of Env-specific IgA antibodies than are induced by the RV144 vaccine may have improved efficacy against HIV-1 infection. Copyright © 2012 Massachusetts Medical Society.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNew England Journal of Medicine. Vol.366, No.14 (2012), 1275-1286en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa1113425en_US
dc.identifier.issn15334406en_US
dc.identifier.issn00284793en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84859393693en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/14840
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859393693&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleImmune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859393693&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections