Publication:
Paravertebral catheter for three-level injection in radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled study

dc.contributor.authorPetchara Sundarathitien_US
dc.contributor.authorBenno Von Bormannen_US
dc.contributor.authorRonnarat Suvikapakornkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanuwat Lertsithichaien_US
dc.contributor.authorVanlapa Arnuntasupakulen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T09:30:26Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T09:30:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-09en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Sundarathiti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Introduction: Paravertebral block (PVB) is an alternative to general anaesthesia (GA) for breast surgery. However, for extensive surgery multiple punctures are needed increasing the immanent risk of the method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PVB via catheter and injections at three different levels. Primary outcome was the quality of postoperative analgesia, in particular, the number of patients requiring additional morphine. Methods: In a randomised single blinded clinical study patients scheduled for breast surgery including axillary approach, were randomly allocated to different anaesthetic techniques, n = 35 each. Patients received either GA with sevoflurane or PVB with catheter at level Th 4. In PVB-patients a 1:2 mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% with adrenaline was injected sequentially 10 ml each at three different levels. Results: Complication-free catheter insertion was possible in all 35 scheduled patients. The need for postoperative analgesics was higher after GA compared to PVB (22 vs.14 patients); p = 0.056. Postoperative morphine consumption was 1.55 (GA) and 0.26 mg (PVB) respectively (p < 0.001). Visual rating score (VRS) for pain at rest and at movement was higher in GA patients on post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) as well as on the ward at 1-6h and 6-12h. Readiness for discharge was earlier after PVB (4.96 and 6.52 hours respectively). After GA the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was higher, though not significantly. Patients' satisfaction was comparable in both groups. Conclusions: Three-level injection PVB via catheter for extensive mastectomy was efficient and well accepted. Using a catheter may enhance safety by avoiding multiple paravertebral punctures when extended spread of analgesia is required. Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02065947.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.10, No.6 (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0129539en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84936803103en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/35145
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84936803103&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleParavertebral catheter for three-level injection in radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84936803103&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections