Publication:
The effect of micro-ECoG substrate footprint on the meningeal tissue response

dc.contributor.authorAmelia A. Schendelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael W. Nonteen_US
dc.contributor.authorCorinne Vokounen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas J. Richneren_US
dc.contributor.authorSarah K. Brodnicken_US
dc.contributor.authorFarid Atryen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeth Fryeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaige Bostromen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamin Pashaieen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanitta Thongpangen_US
dc.contributor.authorKevin W. Eliceirien_US
dc.contributor.authorJustin C. Williamsen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wisconsin Madisonen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Wisconsin Milwaukeeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T02:13:47Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T02:13:47Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. There is great interest in designing implantable neural electrode arrays that maximize function while minimizing tissue effects and damage. Although it has been shown that substrate geometry plays a key role in the tissue response to intracortically implanted, penetrating neural interfaces, there has been minimal investigation into the effect of substrate footprint on the tissue response to surface electrode arrays. This study investigates the effect of micro-electrocorticography (micro-ECoG) device geometry on the longitudinal tissue response. Approach. The meningeal tissue response to two micro-ECoG devices with differing geometries was evaluated. The first device had each electrode site and trace individually insulated, with open regions in between, while the second device had a solid substrate, in which all 16 electrode sites were embedded in a continuous insulating sheet. These devices were implanted bilaterally in rats, beneath cranial windows, through which the meningeal tissue response was monitored for one month after implantation. Electrode site impedance spectra were also monitored during the implantation period. Main results. It was observed that collagenous scar tissue formed around both types of devices. However, the distribution of the tissue growth was different between the two array designs. The mesh devices experienced thick tissue growth between the device and the cranial window, and minimal tissue growth between the device and the brain, while the solid device showed the opposite effect, with thick tissue forming between the brain and the electrode sites. Significance. These data suggest that an open architecture device would be more ideal for neural recording applications, in which a low impedance path from the brain to the electrode sites is critical for maximum recording quality. © 2014 IOP Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Neural Engineering. Vol.11, No.4 (2014)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046011en_US
dc.identifier.issn17412552en_US
dc.identifier.issn17412560en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84903778744en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/33818
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903778744&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titleThe effect of micro-ECoG substrate footprint on the meningeal tissue responseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903778744&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections