Publication: Effect on Dosage Change and Intrapatient Variability After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Among Thai Kidney Transplant Patients With and Without CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
18732623
00411345
00411345
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85071397682
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Transplantation Proceedings. (2019)
Suggested Citation
Nuttasith Larpparisuth, Peenida Skulratanasak, Attapong Vongwiwatana, Nalinee Premasathian Effect on Dosage Change and Intrapatient Variability After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Among Thai Kidney Transplant Patients With and Without CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors. Transplantation Proceedings. (2019). doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.02.065 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/52084
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Effect on Dosage Change and Intrapatient Variability After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus Among Thai Kidney Transplant Patients With and Without CYP3A4/5 Inhibitors
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Background: Converting to once-daily tacrolimus (Advagraf [Adv]) among renal transplant patients results in better drug adherence. Data regarding dosage and intrapatient variability changes after conversion among patients with CYP3A4/5 inhibitors (CYPinh) is lacking. Method: A retrospective chart review among all kidney transplant recipients at Siriraj Hospital was performed. Patients were enrolled who had been on standard release twice-daily tacrolimus and subsequently replaced it with Adv for at least 6 months with no change in CYPinh type or dosage. Results: Fifty-three patients were eligible. Conversion occurred at a mean time after transplant of 51.25 (SD, 40.30) months. Ten patients (18.9%) did not receive CYPinh, while 19 (35.8%), 21 (39.6%), and 3 (5.7%) received diltiazem, ketoconazole or fluconazole, and both diltiazem and ketoconazole, respectively. After conversion, median increment of tacrolimus dosage was 14.29% (−50% to 167%), while no significant change in IPV was demonstrated (17.46% [SD, 11.25%] vs 14.83% [SD, 6.78]; P = .11). Patients receiving azole had less dosage increment than those not receiving CYPinh (P = .02). After conversion, 14 of 22 patients with IPV > 17% (63.6%) had reduced IPV to ≤ 17%, while 25.8% of patients with lower IPV had an increase in IPV > 17%. Conclusion: Conversion to Adv required a dosage increment of 30% to achieve the same trough level. Concomitant use of CYPinh significantly reduced tacrolimus dose increment. A trend was noted toward improved IPV after conversion. Conversion to Adv resulted in better IPV among patients with high IPV while receiving twice-daily tacrolimus.