Publication:
The physiological responses to maximal eating in men

dc.contributor.authorAaron Hengisten_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert M. Edinburghen_US
dc.contributor.authorRussell G. Daviesen_US
dc.contributor.authorJean Philippe Walhinen_US
dc.contributor.authorJariya Buniamen_US
dc.contributor.authorLewis J. Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter J. Rogersen_US
dc.contributor.authorJavier T. Gonzalezen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames A. Bettsen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Bathen_US
dc.contributor.otherNHS Foundation Trusten_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Bristolen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherLoughborough Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T05:56:24Z
dc.date.available2020-05-05T05:56:24Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Nutrition Society. This study investigated metabolic, endocrine, appetite, and mood responses to a maximal eating occasion in fourteen men (mean ±SD: age 28 ±5 y, body mass 77.2 ±6.6 kg, body mass index 24.2 ±2.2 kg·m-2) who completed two trials in a randomised crossover design. On each occasion participants ate a homogenous mixed-macronutrient meal (pizza). On one occasion, they ate until 'comfortably full' (ad libitum) and on the other until they 'could not eat another bite' (maximal). Mean [95% CI] energy intake was double in the maximal (13,024 [10964, 15084] kJ; 3113 [2620,3605] kcal) compared with the ad libitum trial (6627 [5708,7547] kJ; 1584 [1364,1804] kcal). Serum insulin iAUC increased ∼1.5-fold in the maximal compared with ad libitum trial (mean [95% CI] ad libitum 51.1 [33.3,69.0] nmol·L-1·4 h, maximal 78.8 [55.0,102.6] nmol·L-1·4 h, p < 0.01), but glucose iAUC did not differ between trials (ad libitum 94.3 [30.3,158.2] mmol·L-1·4 h, maximal 126.5 [76.9,176.0] mmol·L-1·4 h, p = 0.19). TAG iAUC was ∼1.5-fold greater in the maximal versus ad libitum trial (ad libitum 98.6 [69.9,127.2] mmol·L-1·4 h, maximal 146.4 [88.6,204.1] mmol·L-1·4 h, p < 0.01). Total GLP-1, GIP, and PYY iAUC were greater in the maximal compared with ad libitum trial (p < 0.05). Total ghrelin concentrations decreased to a similar extent, but AUC was slightly lower in the maximal versus ad libitum trial (p = 0.02). There were marked differences on appetite and mood between trials, most notably maximal eating caused a prolonged increase in lethargy. Healthy men have capacity to eat twice the calories required to achieve comfortable fullness at a single meal. Postprandial glycaemia is well-regulated following initial overeating, with elevated postprandial insulinaemia likely contributing.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Nutrition. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0007114520001270en_US
dc.identifier.issn14752662en_US
dc.identifier.issn00071145en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85083282557en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/54679
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083282557&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleThe physiological responses to maximal eating in menen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85083282557&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections