Publication: Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease patients: literature review and worldwide evidence-based practice
Issued Date
2021-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
20591381
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85120736509
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Renal Replacement Therapy. Vol.7, No.1 (2021)
Suggested Citation
Atthaphong Phongphithakchai, Phongsak Dandecha, Sukit Raksasuk, Thatsaphan Srithongkul Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease patients: literature review and worldwide evidence-based practice. Renal Replacement Therapy. Vol.7, No.1 (2021). doi:10.1186/s41100-021-00384-2 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77466
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease patients: literature review and worldwide evidence-based practice
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
The prevalence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is on the rise worldwide. Meanwhile, the number of older people requiring dialysis therapy is increasing as a result of this population. We found that starting dialysis in an unplanned manner is a common occurrence, even for patients with nephrology follow-up. Most centers choose hemodialysis with a high rate of central venous catheter use at the time of initiation of dialysis. Current data has found that central venous catheter use is independently associated with increased mortality and high bacteremia rates. Peritoneal dialysis is one option to avoid bacteremia. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines suggests a break-in period of at least two weeks prior to an elective start of peritoneal dialysis, without mentioning urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. For unplanned ESRD patients, it is unrealistic to wait for two weeks before initiating peritoneal dialysis therapy. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis has been suggested to be a practical approach of prompt initiation of peritoneal dialysis after catheter insertion, which may avoid an increased risk of central venous catheter-related complications, including bacteremia, central venous stenosis, and thrombosis associated with the temporary use of hemodialysis. Peritoneal dialysis is the alternative option, and many studies have presented an interest in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. Some reports have compared urgent-start hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis and found that urgent-start peritoneal dialysis is a safe and effective alternative to hemodialysis for an unplanned dialysis patient. This review aims to compare each literature report regarding techniques, prescriptions, outcomes, complications, and costs of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis.