Publication:
Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Associated risk factors in Thai prostate cancer patients

dc.contributor.authorP. Saksirisampanten_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Nualyongen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Srinualnaden_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Leewansangtongen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Taweemonkongsapen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Jitpraphaien_US
dc.contributor.authorV. Woranisarakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Hansomwongen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-25T10:42:56Z
dc.date.available2020-08-25T10:42:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND| 2020 Objective: To explore and identify the associated risk factors contributing to positive surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in a high-volume tertiary center of Thailand. Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to September 2019, the data of 1,070 prostate cancer patients treated with ORP, LRP, and RARP were retrospectively studied. After excluding cases with pathologically positive lymph nodes, the remaining 995 patients were categorized into 2 groups: one with PSMs and one without PSM. The data of both groups were evaluated using independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Pearson's Chi-squared test, and univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Of the 995 patients, 575 patients (57.8%) had PSMs. Oncologic factors (prostate specific antigen [PSA], prostate weight, percentage of tumor volume, pathologic T stage [pT], and ISUP Gleason Grade Group) were significantly different between the two groups. Meanwhile, patient factors (age and body mass index) and surgical factors (ORP, LRP, RARP, surgeon experience, and nerve sparing) were not significantly different. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, the independent factors associated with the occurrence of PSM were PSA >10 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16 to 2.34; p = 0.005), prostate weight (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.98 to 0.99; p = 0.003), tumor volume >50% (OR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.48 to 7.95; p = 0.004), pT3 (OR: 2.34; 95% CI: 1.68 to 3.25; p<0.001), and ISUP Gleason Grade Group >1 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The independent factors associated with PSM after radical prostatectomy were the oncologic factors, which were PSA, prostate weight (small prostate), percentage of tumor volume, pT, and ISUP Gleason Grade Group. On the contrary, patient factors (age and BMI) and surgical factors (surgical procedure, surgeon experience, and nerve sparing) were found to be unassociated with PSM.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.103, No.5 (2020), 68-74en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85086004595en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/58165
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086004595&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePositive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Associated risk factors in Thai prostate cancer patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086004595&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections