Publication:
How and Whom to Monitor for Seizures in an ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorChusak Limotaien_US
dc.contributor.authorAtiporn Ingsathiten_US
dc.contributor.authorKunlawat Thadaniponen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark McEvoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Attiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Newcastle, Faculty of Health and Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:58:11Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:58:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To pool prevalence of nonconvulsive seizure, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and epileptiform activity detected by different electroencephalography types in critically ills and to compare detection rates among them. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (via PubMed) and SCOPUS (via Scopus) STUDY SELECTION:: Any type of study was eligible if studies were done in adult critically ill, applied any type of electroencephalography, and reported seizure rates. Case reports and case series were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Separated pooling of prevalence of nonconvulsive seizure/nonconvulsive status epilepticus/epileptiform activity and odds ratio of detecting outcomes among different types of electroencephalography was performed using random-effect models. This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and also adhered to the Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies and Cochrane methods for randomized controlled trial studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 78 (16,707 patients) and eight studies (4,894 patients) were eligible for pooling prevalence and odds ratios. For patients with mixed cause of admission, the pooled prevalence of nonconvulsive seizure, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, either nonconvulsive seizure or nonconvulsive status epilepticus detected by routine electroencephalography was 3.1%, 6.2%, and 6.3%, respectively. The corresponding prevalence detected by continuous electroencephalography monitoring was 17.9%, 9.1%, and 15.6%, respectively. In addition, the corresponding prevalence was high in post convulsive status epilepticus (33.5%, 20.2%, and 32.9%), CNS infection (23.9%, 18.1%, and 23.9%), and post cardiac arrest (20.0%, 17.3%, and 22.6%). The pooled conditional log odds ratios of nonconvulsive seizure/nonconvulsive status epilepticus detected by continuous electroencephalography versus routine electroencephalography from studies with paired data 2.57 (95% CI, 1.11-5.96) and pooled odds ratios from studies with independent data was 1.57 (95% CI, 1.00-2.47). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of seizures detected by continuous electroencephalography was significantly higher than with routine electroencephalography. Prevalence was particularly high in post convulsive status epilepticus, CNS infection, and post cardiac arrest.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCritical care medicine. Vol.47, No.4 (2019), e366-e373en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/CCM.0000000000003641en_US
dc.identifier.issn15300293en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85063298432en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51764
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063298432&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleHow and Whom to Monitor for Seizures in an ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063298432&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections