Publication:
Development of indicators to assess the quality of nursing care in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorWipada Kunaviktikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert L. Andersen_US
dc.contributor.authorRatanawadee Chontawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamual Nuntasupawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorWichit Srisuphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrapun Pumarpornen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomchit Hanuchareonkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSommai Hirunnujen_US
dc.contributor.otherChiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Texas at El Pasoen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T08:33:15Z
dc.date.available2018-06-21T08:33:15Z
dc.date.issued2005-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractIn Thailand, quality of nursing care has been defined. The next step is to determine how to measure quality. Given the limited resources to provide health care and the demands to justify the use of registered nurses, there is an urgent need to demonstrate how professional nursing care makes a difference to outcomes of care. The purpose of this study was to further refine nursing indicators of quality by developing operational definitions, validating them and then determining their applicability in a variety of clinical settings. The process included three phases. The first phase used focus groups to identify and define indicators of quality nursing care and the second phase included testing these indicators in four settings to determine if data could be collected. Manuals were developed that defined the quality indicators and the scoring system to be used in the assessment. In the third phase, the findings were presented to a group of experts and minor changes were made to the indicators. Then, the indicators were categorized into three groups: structure, process, and outcome. The validated outcomes and manual for their assessment and monitoring were sent to all hospitals in Thailand. The study relied upon the findings from the four different hospitals. If the indicators were implemented in a wider variety of settings, other differences might have emerged. There is also a possibility that 'best practice' might not be reflective of the scientific basis of nursing practice. The findings generally support the initial work carried out in the USA. There is a need to continue to study how these indicators can improve patient outcomes. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNursing and Health Sciences. Vol.7, No.4 (2005), 273-280en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00247.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn14422018en_US
dc.identifier.issn14410745en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33644813710en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/17151
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33644813710&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of indicators to assess the quality of nursing care in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33644813710&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections