Publication:
Macro-level policy and practice relating to psychosocial factors at work in the Asia Pacific

dc.contributor.authorTessa S. Baileyen_US
dc.contributor.authorYawen Chengen_US
dc.contributor.authorAwang Idrisen_US
dc.contributor.authorSara Arphornen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of South Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Taiwan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Malayaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:28:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:04:20Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:28:43Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:04:20Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. The Asia-Pacific region contains more than a third of the world’s total labour force (CIA, 2014), and yet there are limited collaborative approaches towards managing psychosocial factors at work. While countries such as Japan, Korea and Australia have laws and regulations specific in addressing work-related psychosocial risk aspects many other countries do not (Kawakamiet al. 2014). This chapter examines answers from a focus group of industry experts representing Australia, Taiwan, Malaysia and Thailand regarding industry, state and national policy and initiatives relating to management of work-related psychosocial risk factors. While specific laws relating to worker wellbeing, including compensation systems attributable to psychosocial risk factors such as workload and stressful work conditions, have been established in Australia and Taiwan, other countries are yet to develop clear legal processes. In Malaysia there is a general requirement for employers to provide a safe working environment; however, this is usually interpreted only in relation to physical health. For Thailand laws protecting worker wellbeing are limited to very specific issues such as chemical exposure and muscular-skeletal disorders (MSDs) but no clear expectations exist regarding psychosocial aspects. Socialised expectation to obey authority is identified as a barrier to better psychosocial risk management at work for both Malaysia and Thailand. Awareness of psychosocial factors and their impact on worker health appears to be growing in the region. For example a recently introduced model Workforce Health and Safety Act in Australia specifically refers to psychological health and in Taiwan since 2008 mental disorders have been classified as compensable, if due to stressful work conditions. However even in countries with formal legal and compensation systems in place, barriers such as limited enforcement and lack of focus on prevention of psychosocial risk factors continue to suppress the protection of worker health and wellbeing.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPsychosocial Factors at Work in the Asia Pacific: From Theory to Practice. (2016), 45-59en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-44400-0_3en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85006516242en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/43269
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006516242&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBusiness, Management and Accountingen_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.titleMacro-level policy and practice relating to psychosocial factors at work in the Asia Pacificen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85006516242&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections