Publication:
A comparative study of visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis and optic neuritis with multiple sclerosis

dc.contributor.authorPathanee Samsenen_US
dc.contributor.authorWanicha L. Chuenkongkaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatcharapim Masayaanonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNiphon Chirapapaisanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNgamkae Ruangvaravateen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiriwan Loketen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T02:10:10Z
dc.date.available2018-08-24T02:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2007-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the visual evoked potentials (VEP) in patients with acute optic neuritis, recurrent optic neuritis, and optic neuritis with multiple sclerosis. Material and Method: The authors retrospectively reviewed VEP latency records of the patients with optic neuritis in Siriraj Hospital from 1995 to 2005 and divided them into three groups, acute optic neuritis, recurrent optic neuritis, and optic neuritis with multiple sclerosis (ON/MS). The patients with non-recordable VEP in the analysis were excluded. Comparison of the mean latency of the VEP in affected eyes among the three groups was statistically analyzed by a nonparametric independent sample test. Results: Twenty-two patients with acute optic neuritis, 8 patients with recurrent optic neuritis, and 22 patients with ON/MS participated in this study. The mean age among the three groups was not statistically significant. The median value of the latency of flash VEP (fVEP) and pattern reversal VEP (PRVEP) in the acute optic neuritis group was shorter than that of the recurrent optic neuritis group, and statistically significant (fVEP, p = 0.012; PRVEP, p = 0.004). The median value of the latency of PRVEP in the acute optic neuritis group was shorter than that of the ON/MS group, and statistically significant (PRVEP, p = 0.002). The median value of the latency of both fVEP and PRVEP in the recurrent optic neuritis group and ON/MS group were delayed with no statistical significance (fVEP, p = 0.458; PRVEP, p = 0.403). Conclusion: The VEP can be used to demonstrate the demyelinating mechanism of optic neuritis and optic neuritis with multiple sclerosis, but cannot determine the susceptibility of the patients with acute ON to become MS. The significantly delayed latency of VEP in recurrent optic neuritis is possibly caused by severe damage of the optic nerve conduction from recurrent attacks.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.90, No.2 (2007), 313-318en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33847756362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/24999
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33847756362&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of visual evoked potentials in optic neuritis and optic neuritis with multiple sclerosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33847756362&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections