Publication:
Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study

dc.contributor.authorMarjolein M. Admiraalen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnne Fleur van Rootselaaren_US
dc.contributor.authorJeannette Hofmeijeren_US
dc.contributor.authorCornelia W.E. Hoedemaekersen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristiaan R. van Kaamen_US
dc.contributor.authorHanneke M. Keijzeren_US
dc.contributor.authorMichel J.A.M. van Puttenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcus J. Schultzen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanneke Hornen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Twenteen_US
dc.contributor.otherRijnstate Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedisch Spectrum Twente (MST)en_US
dc.contributor.otherRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:43:55Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:43:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association. Objective: Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG-R) might be a reliable predictor. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of EEG-R using a standardized assessment. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, a strictly defined EEG-R assessment protocol was executed twice per day in adult patients after CA. EEG-R was classified as present or absent by 3 EEG readers, blinded to patient characteristics. Uncertain reactivity was classified as present. Primary outcome was best Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) in 6 months after CA, dichotomized as good (CPC = 1–2) or poor (CPC = 3–5). EEG-R was considered reliable for predicting poor outcome if specificity was ≥95%. For good outcome prediction, a specificity of ≥80% was used. Added value of EEG-R was the increase in specificity when combined with EEG background, neurological examination, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). Results: Of 160 patients enrolled, 149 were available for analyses. Absence of EEG-R for poor outcome prediction had a specificity of 82% and a sensitivity of 73%. For good outcome prediction, specificity was 73% and sensitivity 82%. Specificity for poor outcome prediction increased from 98% to 99% when EEG-R was added to a multimodal model. For good outcome prediction, specificity increased from 70% to 89%. Interpretation: EEG-R testing in itself is not sufficiently reliable for outcome prediction in patients after CA. For poor outcome prediction, it has no substantial added value to EEG background, neurological examination, and SSEPs. For prediction of good outcome, EEG-R seems to have added value. ANN NEUROL 2019.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Neurology. Vol.86, No.1 (2019), 17-27en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ana.25507en_US
dc.identifier.issn15318249en_US
dc.identifier.issn03645134en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85067228743en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51582
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067228743&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleElectroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067228743&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections