Publication:
The effects of temperature and relative humidity on point-of-care glucose measurements in hospital practice in a tropical clinical setting

dc.contributor.authorBusadee Pratumviniten_US
dc.contributor.authorNattakom Charoenkoopen_US
dc.contributor.authorSoamsiri Niwattisaiwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorGerald J. Kosten_US
dc.contributor.authorPanutsaya Tientadakulen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of California, Davisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:30:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:04:26Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:30:48Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:04:26Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Diabetes Technology Society. Background: Hospitals in tropical countries experience conditions that exceed manufacturer temperature and humidity limits for point-of-care (POC) glucose reagents. Our goal was to assess the effects of out-of-limits storage temperature, operating temperature, and operating humidity on POC glucose measurement reliability. Methods: Quality control measurements were performed monthly using glucose test strips stored under controlled conditions and in inpatient wards under ambient conditions. Glucose test strips were evaluated in groups organized by operating temperatures of 24-25 (group 1), 28-29 (group 2), and 33-34°C (group 3), and relative humidity (RH) of ≤70 (group A), ∼80 (group B), and ∼90% (group C). Results: Glucose results for different storage conditions were inconsistent. Measurements at higher operating temperatures had lower values with mean differences of -2.4 (P < .001) and -36.5 (P < .001) mg/dL (28-29 vs 24-25°C), and -3.6 (P < .001) and -37.4 (P < .001) mg/dL (33-34 vs 24-25°C) for low and high control levels, respectively. Measurements at higher RH had lower values with mean differences of -4.0 (P < .001) and -13.2 (P < .001) mg/dL (∼80 vs ≤70% RH), and -5.8 (P < .001) and -16.6 (P < .001) mg/dL (∼90 vs ≤70% RH) for low and high levels, respectively. Conclusions: High temperature and high RH decreased glucose concentrations for the POC oxidase-based system we evaluated. We recommend that individual hospitals perform stress testing, then determine if maximum absolute differences, which represent highest risk for patients, are clinically significant for decision making by using error grid analysis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology. Vol.10, No.5 (2016), 1094-1100en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1932296816633485en_US
dc.identifier.issn19322968en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85012965452en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/43374
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85012965452&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.titleThe effects of temperature and relative humidity on point-of-care glucose measurements in hospital practice in a tropical clinical settingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85012965452&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections