Publication:
Efficacy and limitation of a Chlorhexidine-Based decolonization strategy in preventing transmission of Methidllin-Resistant staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit

dc.contributor.authorRahul Batraen_US
dc.contributor.authorBen S. Cooperen_US
dc.contributor.authorCraig Whiteleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmita K. Patelen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuncan Wyncollen_US
dc.contributor.authorJonathan D. Edgeworthen_US
dc.contributor.otherNHS Foundation Trusten_US
dc.contributor.otherGuy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trusten_US
dc.contributor.otherKing's College Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T09:34:59Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T09:34:59Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-15en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Surface-active antiseptics, such as Chlorhexidine, are increasingly being used as part of intervention programs to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission, despite limited evidence and potential for resistance. We report on the effect of an antiseptic protocol on acquisition of both endemic MRSA and an outbreak strain of MRSA sequence type 239 (designated TW). Methods. Interrupted time-series data on MRSA acquisitions in two 15-bed intensive care units were analyzed using segmented regression models to estimate the effects of sequential introduction of an educational campaign, cohorting, and a chlorhexidine-based antiseptic protocol on transmission of TW and non-TW MRSA strains. Representative TW and non-TW MRSA strains were assessed for carriage of qacA/B genes and antiseptic susceptibility. Results. The antiseptic protocol was associated with a highly significant, immediate 70% reduction in acquisition of non-TW MRSA strains (estimated model-averaged incidence rate ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.47) and an increase in acquisition of TW MRSA strains (estimated model-averaged incidence rate ratio, 3.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-18.59). There was only weak evidence of an effect of other interventions on MRSA transmission. All TW MRSA strains (21 of 21 isolates) and <5% (1 of 21 isolates) of non-TW MRSA strains tested carried the Chlorhexidine resistance loci qacA/B. In vitro Chlorhexidine minimum bactericidal concentrations of TW strains were 3-fold higher than those of non-TW MRSA strains, and in vivo, only patients with non-TW MRSA demonstrated a reduction in the number of colonization sites in response to Chlorhexidine treatment. Conclusion. A chlorhexidine-based surface antiseptic protocol can interrupt transmission of MRSA in the intensive care unit, but strains carrying qacA/B genes may be unaffected or potentially spread more rapidly. © 2009 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Infectious Diseases. Vol.50, No.2 (2010), 210-217en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/648717en_US
dc.identifier.issn10584838en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-73649115314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/29796
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=73649115314&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and limitation of a Chlorhexidine-Based decolonization strategy in preventing transmission of Methidllin-Resistant staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care uniten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=73649115314&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections