Publication:
Cost effectiveness and resource allocation of Plasmodium falciparum malaria control in Myanmar: A modelling analysis of bed nets and community health workers

dc.contributor.authorTom L. Drakeen_US
dc.contributor.authorShwe Sin Kyawen_US
dc.contributor.authorMyat Phone Kyawen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrank M. Smithuisen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicholas P.J. Dayen_US
dc.contributor.authorLisa J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoel Lubellen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMinistry of Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedical Action Myanmaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:15:23Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-29en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Drake et al. Background: Funding for malaria control and elimination in Myanmar has increased markedly in recent years. While there are various malaria control tools currently available, two interventions receive the majority of malaria control funding in Myanmar: (1) insecticide-treated bed nets and (2) early diagnosis and treatment through malaria community health workers. This study aims to provide practical recommendations on how to maximize impact from investment in these interventions. Methods: A simple decision tree is used to model intervention costs and effects in terms of years of life lost. The evaluation is from the perspective of the service provider and costs and effects are calculated in line with standard methodology. Sensitivity and scenario analysis are undertaken to identify key drivers of cost effectiveness. Standard cost effectiveness analysis is then extended via a spatially explicit resource allocation model. Findings: Community health workers have the potential for high impact on malaria, particularly where there are few alternatives to access malaria treatment, but are relatively costly. Insecticide-treated bed nets are comparatively inexpensive and modestly effective in Myanmar, representing a low risk but modest return intervention. Unlike some healthcare interventions, bed nets and community health workers are not mutually exclusive nor are they necessarily at their most efficient when universally applied. Modelled resource allocation scenarios highlight that in this case there is no "one size fits all" cost effectiveness result. Health gains will be maximized by effective targeting of both interventions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMalaria Journal. Vol.14, No.1 (2015)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12936-015-0886-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn14752875en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84942421627en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/36071
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84942421627&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCost effectiveness and resource allocation of Plasmodium falciparum malaria control in Myanmar: A modelling analysis of bed nets and community health workersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84942421627&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections