Publication:
Ocular surface changes after switching from other prostaglandins to tafluprost and preservative-free tafluprost in glaucoma patients

dc.contributor.authorNgamkae Ruangvaravateen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarnthida Choojunen_US
dc.contributor.authorBenjawan Srikulsasitornen_US
dc.contributor.authorJatupol Chokboonpiemen_US
dc.contributor.authorDechathon Asanatongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupaporn Trakanwitthayaraken_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T10:57:54Z
dc.date.available2020-11-18T10:57:54Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Ruangvaravate et al. Purpose: To study ocular surface disease (OSD) changes after switching from preserved prostaglandin analogues monotherapy to preserved tafluprost and preservative-free (PF) tafluprost in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Methods: Glaucoma patients treated with preserved prostaglandins (except tafluprost) mono-therapy for at least 6 months, intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤22 mmHg, and diagnosed of OSD [≥1 criterion; tear break-up time (TBUT) ≤10 seconds, corneal fluorescein staining ≥grade 1] in both eyes were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. All eligible patients were switched from preserved prostaglandin analogues monotherapy (latanoprost, bimatoprost, tra-voprost) to preserved tafluprost in one eye (group I) and PF-tafluprost in the other eye (group II) of the same patient by randomization. The symptoms of OSD were evaluated using the visual analogue scale, and lid inflammation, conjunctival hyperemia, TBUT, corneal fluorescein stain-ing, and Schirmer I test were applied to assess the clinical signs. All parameters were evaluated before and then 6, 12, 24 weeks after switching the medications. Results: Thirty patients (80% women; mean age: 61.2 ±11.5 years) were included. Baseline parameters were not different between the treatment groups. After switching therapies, TBUT was significantly increased in both groups (p = 0.002, p = 0.004, respectively); however, group II had better tear quality. Other symptoms and clinical signs of OSD were improved and IOP was controlled in both groups. Conclusion: Treatment with PF-tafluprost improves TBUT better than preserved tafluprost, suggesting that PF-tafluprost should be especially beneficial for patients with pre-existing OSD. Less or no preservative anti-glaucoma eye drops can restore and enhance the ocular surface in glaucoma patients.en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Ophthalmology. Vol.14, (2020), 3109-3119en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/OPTH.S264984en_US
dc.identifier.issn11775483en_US
dc.identifier.issn11775467en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85092336950en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60113
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092336950&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleOcular surface changes after switching from other prostaglandins to tafluprost and preservative-free tafluprost in glaucoma patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092336950&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections