Publication:
Inpatient treatment of diabetic patients in Asia: Evidence from India, China, Thailand and Malaysia

dc.contributor.authorJ. D. Goldhaber-Fieberten_US
dc.contributor.authorH. Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Ratanawijitrasinen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Vidyasagaren_US
dc.contributor.authorX. Y. Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Aljuniden_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Shahen_US
dc.contributor.authorZ. Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Hirunrassameeen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. L. Bairyen_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Saperien_US
dc.contributor.authorA. M. Nuren_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Egglestonen_US
dc.contributor.otherStanford University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherZhejiang University School of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPharmaceutical System Research and Development Foundation (PhaReD)en_US
dc.contributor.otherKasturba Medical College, Manipalen_US
dc.contributor.otherShandong Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUnited Nations Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMayo Clinicen_US
dc.contributor.otherUKM Medical Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherStanford Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T08:50:19Z
dc.date.available2018-09-24T08:50:19Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has grown rapidly, but little is known about the drivers of inpatient spending in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to compare the clinical presentation and expenditure on hospital admission for inpatients with a primary diagnosis of Type 2 DM in India, China, Thailand and Malaysia. Methods We analysed data on adult, Type 2 DM patients admitted between 2005 and 2008 to five tertiary hospitals in the four countries, reporting expenditures relative to income per capita in 2007. Results Hospital admission spending for diabetic inpatients with no complications ranged from 11 to 75% of per-capita income. Spending for patients with complications ranged from 6% to over 300% more than spending for patients without complications treated at the same hospital. Glycated haemoglobin was significantly higher for the uninsured patients, compared with insured patients, in India (8.6 vs. 8.1%), Hangzhou, China (9.0 vs. 8.1%), and Shandong, China (10.9 vs. 9.9%). When the hospital admission expenditures of the insured and uninsured patients were statistically different in India and China, the uninsured always spent less than the insured patients. Conclusions With the rising prevalence of DM, households and health systems in these countries will face greater economic burdens. The returns to investment in preventing diabetic complications appear substantial. Countries with large out-of-pocket financing burdens such as India and China are associated with the widest gaps in resource use between insured and uninsured patients. This probably reflects both overuse by the insured and underuse by the uninsured. © 2010 Diabetes UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiabetic Medicine. Vol.27, No.1 (2010), 101-108en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02874.xen_US
dc.identifier.issn14645491en_US
dc.identifier.issn07423071en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-73949103811en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/28851
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=73949103811&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleInpatient treatment of diabetic patients in Asia: Evidence from India, China, Thailand and Malaysiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=73949103811&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections