Publication:
Immunodiagnosis of fasciola gigantica infection using monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA and Immunochromatographic Assay for detection of circulating cathepsin L1 Protease

dc.contributor.authorPanat Anuracpreedaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRunglawan Chawengkirttikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrasert Sobhonen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:02:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:03:03Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:02:26Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:03:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-05en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Anuracpreeda et al.This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background Tropical fasciolosis caused by Fasciola gigantica infection is one of the major diseases infecting ruminants in the tropical regions of Africa and Asia including Thailand. Parasitological diagnosis of fasciolosis is often unreliable and possesses low sensitivity. Therefore, the detection of circulating parasite antigens is thought to be a better alternative for diagnosis of fasciolosis, as it reflects the real parasite burden. Methods In this study, we have produced a monoclonal antibody (MoAb) against recombinant F. gigantica cathepsin L1 (rFgCatL1), and developed both sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (sandwich ELISA) and immunochromatographic (IC) test for rapid detection of circulating cathepsin L1 protease (CatL1) in the sera from mice experimentally and cattle naturally infected with Fasciola gigantica. MoAb 4E3 and biotinylated rabbit anti-recombinant CatL1 antibody were selected due to their high reactivities and specificities. Results The lower detection limits of sandwich ELISA and IC test were 3 pg/ml and 0.256 ng/ml, respectively. Sandwich ELISA and IC test could detect F. gigantica infection from day 1 to 35 post infection. In experimental mice, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 95%, 100% and 98.6% (for sandwich ELISA), and 93%, 100% and 98.2% (for IC test), while in natural cattle they were 98.3%, 100% and 99.5%(for sandwich ELISA), and 96.7%, 100% and 99.1% (for IC test). Conclusions These two assay methods showed high efficiencies and precisions for diagnosis of fasciolosis by F. gigantica.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.11, No.1 (2016)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0145650en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84953790549en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/42026
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84953790549&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleImmunodiagnosis of fasciola gigantica infection using monoclonal antibody-based sandwich ELISA and Immunochromatographic Assay for detection of circulating cathepsin L1 Proteaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84953790549&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections