Publication: Comparison of outcomes and direct cost between minimal stimulation and conventional protocols on ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization
dc.contributor.author | Areepan Sophonsritsuk | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wicharn Choktanasiri | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sawaek Weerakiet | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Aram Rojanasakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-21T08:22:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-21T08:22:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-10-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To determine whether minimal stimulation with clomiphene and gonadotropin provides outcomes and direct costs comparable with those of a conventional GnRHa-gonadotropin stimulation protocol for infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Methods: A non-randomized clinical trial was conducted from 1 July 1996 to 31 March 2003 at the Infertility and Assisted Reproductive Unit, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand. A total of 192 patients were recruited of whom 96 cases underwent ovarian stimulated cycles with minimal stimulation protocol, and 96 controls underwent ovarian stimulated cycles with GnRHa-gonadotropin protocol, with cases and controls matched for age and infertility cause. Results: The median patient age was 35 years. Endometriosis was the most frequent infertility cause (28.1%). The conventional GnRHa-gonadotropin protocol could give more oocyte numbers than the minimal stimulation protocol (7.3 ± 4.9 vs 4.5 ± 3.3 oocytes). The fertilization rate and cleavage rate were similar (73.4 ± 31.9 and 84.9 ± 32.6 in minimal stimulation protocol, 69.3 ± 29.6 and 88.4 ± 28.0 in GnRHa-gonadotropin protocol, respectively). The pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval cycle in the GnRHa-gonadotropin protocol was similar to the minimal stimulation protocol. (13.1% vs 13.0%, P = 1.000). However, the cost per pregnancy of minimal stimulation protocol was less than that of GnRHa-gonadotropin protocol. ($US 6021.95 for minimal stimulation protocol per pregnancy, $US 10 785.65 for GnRHa-gonadotropin protocol per pregnancy, P < 0.000). Conclusion: Minimal stimulation was less effective than conventional GnRHa-gonadotropin on the ovarian stimulation. However, the total costs of minimal stimulation were cheaper than the conventional GnRHa-gonadotropin protocol. The decreased costs of minimal stimulation justifies further evaluation of its role in the treatment of infertility in selected cases. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. Vol.31, No.5 (2005), 459-463 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00320.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 14470756 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 13418076 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-27744597622 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/16801 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=27744597622&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of outcomes and direct cost between minimal stimulation and conventional protocols on ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=27744597622&origin=inward | en_US |