Publication: A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications
Issued Date
2018-05-01
Resource Type
ISSN
14716771
00070912
00070912
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85045581772
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
British Journal of Anaesthesia. Vol.120, No.5 (2018), 1066-1079
Suggested Citation
T. E.F. Abbott, A. J. Fowler, P. Pelosi, M. Gama de Abreu, A. M. Møller, J. Canet, B. Creagh-Brown, M. Mythen, T. Gin, M. M. Lalu, E. Futier, M. P. Grocott, M. J. Schultz, R. M. Pearse, P. Myles, T. J. Gan, A. Kurz, P. Peyton, D. Sessler, M. Tramèr, A. Cyna, G. S. De Oliveira, C. Wu, M. Jensen, H. Kehlet, M. Botti, O. Boney, G. Haller, T. Cook, L. Fleisher, M. Neuman, D. Story, R. Gruen, S. Bampoe, Lis Evered, D. Scott, B. Silbert, D. van Dijk, C. Kalkman, M. Chan, H. Grocott, R. Eckenhoff, L. Rasmussen, L. Eriksson, S. Beattie, D. Wijeysundera, G. Landoni, K. Leslie, B. Biccard, S. Howell, P. Nagele, T. Richards, A. Lamy, M. Gabreu, A. Klein, T. Corcoran, D. Jamie Cooper, S. Dieleman, E. Diouf, D. McIlroy, R. Bellomo, A. Shaw, J. Prowle, K. Karkouti, J. Billings, D. Mazer, M. Jayarajah, M. Murphy, J. Bartoszko, R. Sneyd, S. Morris, R. George, R. Moonesinghe, M. Shulman, M. Lane-Fall, U. Nilsson, N. Stevenson, W. van Klei, L. Cabrini, T. Miller, N. Pace, S. Jackson, D. Buggy, T. Short, B. Riedel, V. Gottumukkala, B. Alkhaffaf, M. Johnson A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Vol.120, No.5 (2018), 1066-1079. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.007 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46744
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications
Author(s)
T. E.F. Abbott
A. J. Fowler
P. Pelosi
M. Gama de Abreu
A. M. Møller
J. Canet
B. Creagh-Brown
M. Mythen
T. Gin
M. M. Lalu
E. Futier
M. P. Grocott
M. J. Schultz
R. M. Pearse
P. Myles
T. J. Gan
A. Kurz
P. Peyton
D. Sessler
M. Tramèr
A. Cyna
G. S. De Oliveira
C. Wu
M. Jensen
H. Kehlet
M. Botti
O. Boney
G. Haller
T. Cook
L. Fleisher
M. Neuman
D. Story
R. Gruen
S. Bampoe
Lis Evered
D. Scott
B. Silbert
D. van Dijk
C. Kalkman
M. Chan
H. Grocott
R. Eckenhoff
L. Rasmussen
L. Eriksson
S. Beattie
D. Wijeysundera
G. Landoni
K. Leslie
B. Biccard
S. Howell
P. Nagele
T. Richards
A. Lamy
M. Gabreu
A. Klein
T. Corcoran
D. Jamie Cooper
S. Dieleman
E. Diouf
D. McIlroy
R. Bellomo
A. Shaw
J. Prowle
K. Karkouti
J. Billings
D. Mazer
M. Jayarajah
M. Murphy
J. Bartoszko
R. Sneyd
S. Morris
R. George
R. Moonesinghe
M. Shulman
M. Lane-Fall
U. Nilsson
N. Stevenson
W. van Klei
L. Cabrini
T. Miller
N. Pace
S. Jackson
D. Buggy
T. Short
B. Riedel
V. Gottumukkala
B. Alkhaffaf
M. Johnson
A. J. Fowler
P. Pelosi
M. Gama de Abreu
A. M. Møller
J. Canet
B. Creagh-Brown
M. Mythen
T. Gin
M. M. Lalu
E. Futier
M. P. Grocott
M. J. Schultz
R. M. Pearse
P. Myles
T. J. Gan
A. Kurz
P. Peyton
D. Sessler
M. Tramèr
A. Cyna
G. S. De Oliveira
C. Wu
M. Jensen
H. Kehlet
M. Botti
O. Boney
G. Haller
T. Cook
L. Fleisher
M. Neuman
D. Story
R. Gruen
S. Bampoe
Lis Evered
D. Scott
B. Silbert
D. van Dijk
C. Kalkman
M. Chan
H. Grocott
R. Eckenhoff
L. Rasmussen
L. Eriksson
S. Beattie
D. Wijeysundera
G. Landoni
K. Leslie
B. Biccard
S. Howell
P. Nagele
T. Richards
A. Lamy
M. Gabreu
A. Klein
T. Corcoran
D. Jamie Cooper
S. Dieleman
E. Diouf
D. McIlroy
R. Bellomo
A. Shaw
J. Prowle
K. Karkouti
J. Billings
D. Mazer
M. Jayarajah
M. Murphy
J. Bartoszko
R. Sneyd
S. Morris
R. George
R. Moonesinghe
M. Shulman
M. Lane-Fall
U. Nilsson
N. Stevenson
W. van Klei
L. Cabrini
T. Miller
N. Pace
S. Jackson
D. Buggy
T. Short
B. Riedel
V. Gottumukkala
B. Alkhaffaf
M. Johnson
Other Contributor(s)
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Dresden University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine
UCL
Queen Mary, University of London
University of Surrey
Amtssygehuset i Herlev
Mahidol University
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Dresden University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine
UCL
Queen Mary, University of London
University of Surrey
Amtssygehuset i Herlev
Mahidol University
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Abstract
© 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia Background: There is a need for robust, clearly defined, patient-relevant outcome measures for use in randomised trials in perioperative medicine. Our objective was to establish standard outcome measures for postoperative pulmonary complications research. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Web of Science, SciELO, and the Korean Journal Database. Definitions were extracted from included manuscripts. We then conducted a three-stage Delphi consensus process to select the optimal outcome measures in terms of methodological quality and overall suitability for perioperative trials. Results: From 2358 records, the full texts of 81 manuscripts were retrieved, of which 45 met the inclusion criteria. We identified three main categories of outcome measure specific to perioperative pulmonary outcomes: (i) composite outcome measures of multiple pulmonary outcomes (27 definitions); (ii) pneumonia (12 definitions); and (iii) respiratory failure (six definitions). These were rated by the group according to suitability for routine use. The majority of definitions were given a low score, and many were imprecise, difficult to apply consistently, or both, in large patient populations. A small number of highly rated definitions were identified as appropriate for widespread use. The group then recommended four outcome measures for future use, including one new definition. Conclusions: A large number of postoperative pulmonary outcome measures have been used, but most are poorly defined. Our four recommended outcome measures include a new definition of postoperative pulmonary complications, incorporating an assessment of severity. These definitions will meet the needs of most clinical effectiveness trials of treatments to improve postoperative pulmonary outcomes.