Publication:
Multicentre evaluation of a novel vaginal dose reporting method in 153 cervical cancer patients

dc.contributor.authorHenrike Westervelden_US
dc.contributor.authorAstrid de Leeuwen_US
dc.contributor.authorKathrin Kirchheineren_US
dc.contributor.authorPittaya Dankulchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorBernard Oostervelden_US
dc.contributor.authorArun Oinamen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert Hudejen_US
dc.contributor.authorJamema Swamidasen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacob Lindegaarden_US
dc.contributor.authorKari Tanderupen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichard Pötteren_US
dc.contributor.authorChristian Kirisitsen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedizinische Universitat Wienen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity Medical Center Utrechten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Radiation Oncologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherOnkološki inštitut Ljubljanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherTata Memorial Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherArhus Universitetshospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:29:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:07Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:29:51Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Background and purpose Recently, a vaginal dose reporting method for combined EBRT and BT in cervical cancer patients was proposed. The current study was to evaluate vaginal doses with this method in a multicentre setting, wherein different applicators, dose rates and protocols were used. Material and methods In a subset of patients from the EMBRACE study, vaginal doses were evaluated. Doses at the applicator surface left/right and anterior/posterior and at 5 mm depth were measured. In addition, the dose at the Posterior–Inferior Border of Symphysis (PIBS) vaginal dose point and PIBS±2 cm, corresponding to the mid and lower vagina, was measured. Results 153 patients from seven institutions were included. Large dose variations expressed in EQD2 with α/β = 3 Gy were seen between patients, in particular at the top left and right vaginal wall (median 195 (range 61–947) Gy/178 (61–980) Gy, respectively). At 5 mm depth, doses were 98 (55–212) Gy/91 (54–227) Gy left/right, and 71 (51–145) Gy/67 (49–189) Gy anterior/posterior, respectively. The dose at PIBS and PIBS±2 cm was 41 (3–81) Gy, 54 (32–109) Gy and 5 (1–51) Gy, respectively. At PIBS+2 cm (mid vagina) dose variation was coming from BT. The variation at PIBS−2 cm (lower vagina) was mainly dependent on EBRT field border location. Conclusions This novel method for reporting vaginal doses coming from EBRT and BT through well-defined dose points gives a robust representation of the dose along the vaginal axis. In addition, it allows comparison of vaginal dose between patients from different centres. The doses at the PIBS points represent the doses at the mid and lower parts of the vagina. Large variations in dose throughout the vagina were observed between patients and centres.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRadiotherapy and Oncology. Vol.120, No.3 (2016), 420-427en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.002en_US
dc.identifier.issn18790887en_US
dc.identifier.issn01678140en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84970028486en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/41176
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84970028486&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleMulticentre evaluation of a novel vaginal dose reporting method in 153 cervical cancer patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84970028486&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections