Publication:
Home-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients in Thailand: Cost-utility and budget impact analyses

dc.contributor.authorNattanichcha Kulthanachairojanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhichai Chansriwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorNintita Sripaiboonkij Thokaniten_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwannee Sirilerttrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorNopakan Wannakansophonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthira Taychakhoonavudhen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T05:36:27Z
dc.date.available2021-02-03T05:36:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Home-based chemotherapy (HC) is a new treatment alternative to hospital-based chemotherapy treatment (IP) and is administered via portable intravenous pumps at the patient's home. HC reduces the demand for inpatient bed capacity in hospitals and reduces the cost of an infusion. This study takes a societal perspective while conducting the cost-utility and budget impact analyses (BIA) of HC and IP with an mFOLFOX6 regimen on patients with stage III colon cancer. We conducted a cost-utility analysis with a 6-month time horizon. The parameter inputs for the model were gathered from a retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok. The resource usage of HC and IP was determined based on medical records. The per-unit direct medical, home health service, and adverse events (AE) management costs were gathered from the standard cost list. The health outcome of treatment was measured in terms of quality-adjusted life years. Disutility related to AE was calculated. We conducted a sensitivity analysis for the uncertainty results and performed BIA based on the societal perspective on a 1-year time horizon. HC provided a cost-saving of $1,513.37 per patient for the period of treatment. Thus, assuming 526 patients per year, the use of HC could achieve a cumulative annual cost-saving of $828,436. HC is a cost-saving strategy compared to IP for stage III colon cancer treatment. We recommend that the service reimbursement should include national standardization in chemotherapy regimens as well as practice guidelines and protocols to prevent serious AEs.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCancer Medicine. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cam4.3690en_US
dc.identifier.issn20457634en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85098290369en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60884
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098290369&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleHome-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients in Thailand: Cost-utility and budget impact analysesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098290369&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections