Publication:
Comparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells

dc.contributor.authorAbinaya Chandrasekaranen_US
dc.contributor.authorHasan X. Avcien_US
dc.contributor.authorAnna Ochaleken_US
dc.contributor.authorLone N. Rösinghen_US
dc.contributor.authorKinga Molnáren_US
dc.contributor.authorLajos Lászlóen_US
dc.contributor.authorTamás Belláken_US
dc.contributor.authorAnnamária Téglásien_US
dc.contributor.authorKrisztina Pestien_US
dc.contributor.authorArpad Mikeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhetcharat Phanthongen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrsolya Bíróen_US
dc.contributor.authorVanessa Hallen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarisorn Kitiyananten_US
dc.contributor.authorKarl Heinz Krauseen_US
dc.contributor.authorJulianna Koboláken_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrás Dinnyésen_US
dc.contributor.otherBioTalentum Ltd.en_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Szeged Faculty of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherSzent István Egyetemen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversité de Genève Faculté de Médecineen_US
dc.contributor.otherEötvös Loránd Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherOpto-Neuropharmacology Groupen_US
dc.contributor.otherSemmelweis Egyetemen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKøbenhavns Universiteten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T06:38:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:38Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T06:38:00Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:38Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 The Authors Neural progenitor cells (NPCs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are frequently induced using 3D culture methodologies however, it is unknown whether spheroid-based (3D) neural induction is actually superior to monolayer (2D) neural induction. Our aim was to compare the efficiency of 2D induction with 3D induction method in their ability to generate NPCs, and subsequently neurons and astrocytes. Neural differentiation was analysed at the protein level qualitatively by immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by flow cytometry for NPC (SOX1, PAX6, NESTIN), neuronal (MAP2, TUBB3), cortical layer (TBR1, CUX1) and glial markers (SOX9, GFAP, AQP4). Electron microscopy demonstrated that both methods resulted in morphologically similar neural rosettes. However, quantification of NPCs derived from 3D neural induction exhibited an increase in the number of PAX6/NESTIN double positive cells and the derived neurons exhibited longer neurites. In contrast, 2D neural induction resulted in more SOX1 positive cells. While 2D monolayer induction resulted in slightly less mature neurons, at an early stage of differentiation, the patch clamp analysis failed to reveal any significant differences between the electrophysiological properties between the two induction methods. In conclusion, 3D neural induction increases the yield of PAX6+/NESTIN+cells and gives rise to neurons with longer neurites, which might be an advantage for the production of forebrain cortical neurons, highlighting the potential of 3D neural induction, independent of iPSCs′ genetic background.en_US
dc.identifier.citationStem Cell Research. Vol.25, (2017), 139-151en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scr.2017.10.010en_US
dc.identifier.issn18767753en_US
dc.identifier.issn18735061en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85033404451en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/41668
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033404451&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleComparison of 2D and 3D neural induction methods for the generation of neural progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent stem cellsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033404451&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections