Publication:
MIGRATION AND SHUKATSU: JAPANESE INDIVIDUAL STRATEGIES IN THE THIRD AGE AND BEYOND

dc.contributor.authorSutpratana Duangkaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanokwan Tangchitnusornen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:01:34Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:01:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstractGlobalization has made it easier for retirees to select their desired place to live. International retirement migration (IRM) has become an exclusive activity of retirees from the First World countries. Many of them ventured to spend their retirement years or even the rest of their lives in less developed or developing destinations overseas. Though the idea of Shukatsu or the preparation for the end of life of an individual is nothing new in Japan, the term was just covered in the media recently and garnered attention both domestically and internationally. This article aimed to address two later-life strategies employed by Japanese retirees in response to Japan's super-aged population structure, including IRM and Shukatsu. The practices of Shukatsu (e.g., self-management of one’s last will and funeral arrangements) stemmed from the idea of Japanese people not wanting to become a burden to others, even after they have departed from life. On the other hand, IRM is a long-term or permanent move involving searching for a better way of life at a new destination abroad during the third age and beyond. Like Shukatsu, IRM is a popular alternative among younger old persons to financially, physically, and emotionally sustain their independence. Many Japanese retirees and senior citizens of Western countries chose to retire in Southeast Asia, especially in Thailand and Malaysia. Due to unclear timing requirements for the Japanese people retiring abroad, IRM could be considered a pre-episode of Shukatsu before returning to Japan or a part of Shukatsu for those who intended to spend the rest of their life at the destination abroad. The authors reviewed the literature on IRM and Shukatsu regarding Japanese retirees in light of the nexus of these two strategies and policy implications in both sending and receiving countries. Suggestions for further research were also discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHumanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies. Vol.21, No.3 (2021), 387-395en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14456/hasss.2021.35en_US
dc.identifier.issn26300079en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85128207985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/75829
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128207985&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleMIGRATION AND SHUKATSU: JAPANESE INDIVIDUAL STRATEGIES IN THE THIRD AGE AND BEYONDen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128207985&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections