Publication:
Accuracy of tumour-associated circulating endothelial cells as a screening biomarker for clinically significant prostate cancer

dc.contributor.authorSebastian Chakrit Bhakdien_US
dc.contributor.authorPrapat Suriyapholen_US
dc.contributor.authorPonpan Thaicharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSebastian Tobias Karl Groteen_US
dc.contributor.authorChulaluk Komoltrien_US
dc.contributor.authorBansithi Chaiyaprasithien_US
dc.contributor.authorKomgrid Charnkaewen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherX-ZELLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T07:40:50Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T07:40:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Even though more than 350,000 men die from prostate cancer every year, broad-based screening for the disease remains a controversial topic. Guidelines demand that the only commonly accepted screening tool, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, must be followed by prostate biopsy if results are elevated. Due to the procedure’s low positive predictive value (PPV), however, over 80% of biopsies are performed on healthy men or men with clinically insignificant cancer—prompting calls for new ways of vetting equivocal PSA readings prior to the procedure. Responding to the challenge, the present study investigated the diagnostic potential of tumour-associated circulating endothelial cells (tCECs), which have previously been described as a novel, blood-based biomarker for clinically significant cancers. Specifically, the objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a tCEC-based blood test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4) in high-risk patients. Performed in a blinded, prospective, single-centre set-up, it compared a novel tCEC index test with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy biopsy as a reference on a total of 170 patients and found that a tCEC add-on test will almost double the PPV of a standalone PSA test (32% vs. 17%; p = 0.0012), while retaining a negative predictive value above 90%.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCancers. Vol.11, No.8 (2019)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers11081064en_US
dc.identifier.issn20726694en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85070599612en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/50114
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070599612&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of tumour-associated circulating endothelial cells as a screening biomarker for clinically significant prostate canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070599612&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections