Publication:
Preservice and inservice science teachers' responses and reasoning about the nature of science

dc.contributor.authorKhajornsak Buaraphanen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-13T07:15:58Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T07:15:58Z
dc.date.issued2009-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAn adequate understanding of the nature of science (NOS) is essential for science teachers. The Myths of Science Questionnaire (MOSQ) consisting of 14 items, which comprised both optional and written types of response, was utilised to explore 113 Thai preservice and 101 inservice science teachers' understanding and reasoning about the NOS, particularly scientific knowledge, scientific method, scientists' work and scientific enterprise. A highly consistent pattern of responses emerged regarding the status of theories and laws, a hierarchical relationship between theory and law, tentativeness of science and science as cumulative knowledge. Most of them were uninformed understanding of the NOS. The MOSQ expressed, to some extent, the effectiveness in illustrating respondents' reasoning about the NOS. The implications concerning the MOSQ and science teacher preparation and professional development are also discussed. © 2009 Academic Journals.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEducational Research and Reviews. Vol.4, No.11 (2009), 561-581en_US
dc.identifier.issn19903839en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-77953000160en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/28359
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77953000160&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titlePreservice and inservice science teachers' responses and reasoning about the nature of scienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77953000160&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections