Publication:
Immediate stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures Versus delayed stabilization

dc.contributor.authorSaranatra Waikakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorThossart Harnroongrojen_US
dc.contributor.authorVichai Vanadurongwanen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T08:56:29Z
dc.date.available2018-09-07T08:56:29Z
dc.date.issued1999-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractTo compare the immediate and long term outcome of immediate stabilization of the unstable pelvic fractures to delayed stabilization with simple external fixation, the study was carried out as a paralell trial with 2 year follow-up. There were 112 patients with 69 males and 43 females who had unstable pelvic fractures. They were allocated randomly into 2 groups. In group 1, 40 patients, conventional management was performed while in group 2, 72 patients, reduction and anterior stabilization of pelvic fractures with a simple external fixator were carried out immediately just after the unstable fractures were detected. Blood transfusion, post operative pain, need of reconstructive surgery of the pelvic fractures and late deformities were less in the group 2. Immediate anterior reduction and stabilization of the unstable pelvic fractures gave encouraging results.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.82, No.7 (1999)en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-9444285819en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/25616
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=9444285819&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleImmediate stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures Versus delayed stabilizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=9444285819&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections