Publication:
Association between the use of colistin for short-term treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections and the emergence of colistin-resistant enterobacteriaceae in swine from selected swine farms in thailand

dc.contributor.authorPariwat Poolpermen_US
dc.contributor.authorTeerawit Tangkoskulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChakkrapong Seenamaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaruemon Maknakhonen_US
dc.contributor.authorVisanu Thamlikitkulen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campusen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T07:41:07Z
dc.date.available2020-11-18T07:41:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright: © 2020 Poolperm et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Long-term use of colistin for preventing Gram-negative bacterial infections in food animals was prohibited in Thailand in 2017, but it is permitted for short-term treatment. This study aimed to investigate association between the use of colistin for short-term treatment of infection and the emergence of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in swine. The current study was conducted at 2 selected swine farms in Thailand. Neither farm has used colistin to prevent infection for longer than 1 year. Rectal swabs were collected from the same 66 pigs at birth, and on days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 60. Colistin was used to treat sick pigs for up to 3 days. Additional rectal swabs were collected during colistin treatment. Rectal swabs were analyzed for colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and the mcr-1 gene. Results revealed that colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were absent at birth. Some pigs at both farms had diarrhea and received colistin treatment during days 2–27. Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were detected in 13.3–50.0% of sick and healthy pigs. No sick pigs were observed during days 28–60, and colistin was not used during that period. Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were detected in 2.8–10.0% of healthy pigs on day 28, and in 0–3.4% of healthy pigs on day 60. The mcr-1 gene was detected in 57.6% of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Short-term treatment with colistin was found to be associated with the emergence of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in swine. Colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae rapidly emerged after colistin use, and rapidly decreased or disappeared after its discontinuation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.15, No.10 October (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0238939en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85092322424en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/59812
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092322424&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleAssociation between the use of colistin for short-term treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections and the emergence of colistin-resistant enterobacteriaceae in swine from selected swine farms in thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092322424&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections