Publication:
Evaluation of a 12-week lifestyle education intervention with or without partial meal replacement in Thai adults with obesity and metabolic syndrome: A randomised trial

dc.contributor.authorKusuma Chaiyasooten_US
dc.contributor.authorRungnapha Sarasaken_US
dc.contributor.authorBanchamaphon Pheungruangen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuwitcha Dawilaien_US
dc.contributor.authorPornpoj Pramyothinen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdhiratha Boonyasirien_US
dc.contributor.authorOrawan Supapuengen_US
dc.contributor.authorFriedrich C. Jassilen_US
dc.contributor.authorPreyanuj Yamwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorRachel L. Batterhamen_US
dc.contributor.otherUCLen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:33:48Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:33:48Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background/Objectives: There have been no studies examining the efficacy of meal replacement (MR) on weight loss and metabolic syndrome (MS) improvement in Southeast Asians. Thus, we undertook a 12-week randomised trial to evaluate the effect of a lifestyle education intervention alone (LEI) or with partial MR (LEI + MR) in obese Thai adults with MS. Subjects/Methods: A total of 110 patients were randomised to receive either LEI or LEI + MR. Both groups received LEI to achieve weight loss. LEI + MR group additionally received two MR daily to replace either breakfast, lunch or dinner. Mean ± SE body mass index of all participants was 34.6 ± 0.6 kg/m 2 , mean ± SE age was 42.5 ± 1.1 years and 83% of patients were female. Both groups were compared for anthropometric and cardiometabolic indices at 12-week. Body weight was also compared at weeks 38 and 64. Results: At 12 weeks, both groups exhibited statistically significant percentage weight loss (%WL) compared to initial weight but greater %WL was observed in LEI + MR compared to LEI, 2.9% vs. 1.5%, respectively (p < 0.05). MS criteria such as waist circumference and blood pressure improved significantly in both groups compared to baseline. However, improvement in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was only significant in LEI + MR, and more participants with impaired FPG at baseline in LEI + MR (42.9%) than LEI (19%) returned to normal FPG at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). HbA 1c , fasting insulin and HOMA-IR in LEI + MR were significantly lower than with LEI. At the end of the 12-week intervention period, 16% of participants no longer fulfilled MS criteria. A statistically significant weight loss from baseline persisted until 38 weeks but no longer reached statistically significant difference between groups Conclusions: LEI and LEI + MR were acceptable and led to improvement in weight and MS. LEI + MR group exhibited additional weight reduction and glycemic benefits at 12 weeks.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNutrition and Diabetes. Vol.8, No.1 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41387-018-0034-0en_US
dc.identifier.issn20444052en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85046143308en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46153
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046143308&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of a 12-week lifestyle education intervention with or without partial meal replacement in Thai adults with obesity and metabolic syndrome: A randomised trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046143308&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections