Publication:
Use of flow field-flow fractionation and single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for size determination of selenium nanoparticles in a mixture

dc.contributor.authorLuluil Maknunen_US
dc.contributor.authorJitapa Sumranjiten_US
dc.contributor.authorAtitaya Siripinyanonden_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Nanotechnology Centeren_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T04:37:05Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T04:37:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThis journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry. Various analytical techniques have been used for size analysis of selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs). These include flow field-flow fractionation (FlFFF), single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SP-ICP-MS), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). For hydrodynamic diameter estimation, the FlFFF technique was used and the results were compared with those analyzed by DLS. For core diameter estimation, the results obtained from SP-ICP-MS were compared with those from TEM. Two types of FlFFF channel were employed, i.e., symmetrical FlFFF (Sy-FlFFF) and asymmetrical FlFFF (Asy-FlFFF). Considering the use of FlFFF, optimization was performed on a Sy-FlFFF channel to select the most appropriate carrier liquid and membrane in order to minimize problems due to particle membrane interaction. The use of FL-70 and 10 kDa RC provided an acceptable compromise peak quality and size accuracy for all samples of SeNPs which were coated by proteins (positively charged SeNPs) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (negatively charged SeNPs). FlFFF always yielded the lower estimate of the hydrodynamic size than DLS as a reference method. The results obtained by SP-ICP-MS were consistent with the TEM method for the core diameter estimation. The results from FlFFF and the DLS reference method were significantly different as confirmed by paired t-test analysis, while the results provided by SP-ICP-MS and the TEM reference method were not significantly different. Furthermore, consecutive size analysis by SP-ICP-MS for the fractions collected from FlFFF was proposed for sizing of SeNP mixtures. The combined technique helps to improve the size analysis in the complex samples and shows more advantages than using only SP-ICP-MS.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRSC Advances. Vol.10, No.11 (2020), 6423-6435en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/c9ra07120ben_US
dc.identifier.issn20462069en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85079547500en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/53633
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079547500&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.titleUse of flow field-flow fractionation and single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for size determination of selenium nanoparticles in a mixtureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079547500&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections