Publication:
Risk factors of early periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty

dc.contributor.authorChaturong Pornrattanamaneewongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkraporn Sitthitheeraruten_US
dc.contributor.authorPakpoom Ruangsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKeerati Chareancholvanichen_US
dc.contributor.authorRapeepat Narkbunnamen_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:00:00Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:00:00Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is a serious complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the risk factors of PFF in the early postoperative setting are not well documented. This study determines the risk factors of early PFF after primary TKA. Methods: This study recruited 24 patients who had early PFF within postoperative 3 months and 96 control patients. Demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, body mass index, Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index, diagnosis, operated side, underlying diseases and history of steroid usage intraoperative outcomes), intraoperative outcomes (operative time, surgical approach, type and brand of the prosthesis), and radiographic outcomes (distal femoral width; DFW, prosthesis-distal femoral width ratio; PDFW ratio, anatomical lateral distal femoral angle; LDFA, the change of LDFA, femoral component flexion angle; FCFA and anterior femoral notching; AFN) were recorded and compared between groups. Details of PFF, including fracture pattern, preoperative deformity, and time to PFF were also documented. Results: In univariate analysis, the PFF group had significantly older, right side injury, rheumatoid, dyslipidemia, Parkinson patients than the control group (p < 0.05). No cruciate-retaining design was used in PFF group (p = 0.004). Differences between the prosthetic brand used were found in this study (p = 0.049). For radiographic outcomes, PFF group had significantly lower DFW but higher PDFW ratio and postoperative LDFA than the control group (p < 0.05). While the change of LDFA, FCFA and AFN were similar between groups. The fracture patterns were medial condylar (45.8%), lateral condylar (25.0%) and supracondylar fracture (29.2%). The mean overall time to PFF was 37.2 ± 20.6 days (range 8–87 days). Preoperative deformity was significantly different among the three patterns (p < 0.05). When performed multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model, age was only an independent risk factor for early PFF. The cut-off point of age was > = 75 years, with a sensitivity of 75.0% and specificity of 78.1%. Conclusion: This study determined that age was the independent risk factors for early PFF. However, further well-controlled studies with a larger sample size were needed to address this issue.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. Vol.22, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12891-021-04875-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712474en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85120734646en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77467
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120734646&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRisk factors of early periprosthetic femoral fracture after total knee arthroplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120734646&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections