Publication:
Engaging communities in non-communicable disease research and interventions in low- And middle-income countries: A realist review protocol

dc.contributor.authorSonja Klingbergen_US
dc.contributor.authorBipin Adhikarien_US
dc.contributor.authorCatherine E. Draperen_US
dc.contributor.authorEdna N. Bosireen_US
dc.contributor.authorPriscilla Tiigahen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeborah Nyirendaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFerdinand C. Mukumbangen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPublic Health Englanden_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of the Witwatersrand Faculty of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Malawien_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Washingtonen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:18:14Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:18:14Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-21en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Engaging communities and intended beneficiaries at various stages of health research is a recommended practice. The contribution of community engagement to non-communicable disease research in low- and middle-income countries has not yet been extensively studied or synthesised. This protocol describes the steps towards generating an understanding of community engagement in the context of non-communicable disease research, prevention and health promotion using a realist review approach. A realist lens enables a rich explanatory approach to causation while capturing complexity, and an openness to multiple outcomes, including unintended consequences. The review will thus develop an understanding of community engagement without assuming that such practices result in more ethical research or effective interventions. Methods and analysis We propose a realist approach aiming to examine how, why, under what circumstances and for whom community engagement works or does not work. The iterative review steps include clarifying the review scope; searching for evidence; appraising studies and extracting data; synthesising evidence and drawing conclusions; and disseminating, implementing and evaluating the findings. Principles of meta-narrative review (pragmatism, pluralism, historicity, contestation, reflexivity and peer review) are employed to ensure practicable and contextualised review outputs. The proposed review will draw on theoretical and empirical literature beyond specific diseases or settings, but with a focus on informing non-communicable disease research and interventions in low- and middle-income countries. The synthesis of existing literature will be complemented by qualitative realist interviews and stakeholder consultation. Through drawing on multiple types of evidence and input from both experts and intended beneficiaries, the review will provide critical and pragmatic insights for research and community engagement in low- and middle-income countries. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of the Witwatersrand. Dissemination will include traditional academic channels, institutional communications, social media and discussions with a wide range of stakeholders.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. Vol.11, No.7 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050632en_US
dc.identifier.issn20446055en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85111091011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/78028
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111091011&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEngaging communities in non-communicable disease research and interventions in low- And middle-income countries: A realist review protocolen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85111091011&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections