Publication:
Effects of COVID-19 government travel restrictions on mobility in a rural border area of Northern Thailand: A mobile phone tracking study

dc.contributor.authorPeter Haddawyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaranath Lawpoolsrien_US
dc.contributor.authorChaitawat Sa-Ngamuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorMyat Su Yinen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas Barkowskyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnuwat Wiratsudakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaranit Kaewkungwalen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmnat Khamsiriwatcharaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatiwat Sa-Angchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorJetsumon Sattabongkoten_US
dc.contributor.authorLiwang Cuien_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMorsani College of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversität Bremenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T11:41:35Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T11:41:35Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground Thailand is among the top five countries with effective COVID-19 transmission control. This study examines how news of presence of COVID-19 in Thailand, as well as varying levels of government restriction on movement, affected human mobility in a rural Thai population along the border with Myanmar. Methods This study makes use of mobility data collected using a smartphone app. Between November 2019 and June 2020, four major events concerning information dissemination or government intervention give rise to five time intervals of analysis. Radius of gyration is used to analyze movement in each interval, and movement during government-imposed curfew. Human mobility network visualization is used to identify changes in travel patterns between main geographic locations of activity. Cross-border mobility analysis highlights potential for intervillage and intercountry disease transmission. Results Inter-village and cross-border movement was common in the pre-COVID-19 period. Radius of gyration and cross-border trips decreased following news of the first imported cases. During the government lockdown period, radius of gyration was reduced by more than 90% and cross-border movement was mostly limited to short-distance trips. Human mobility was nearly back to normal after relaxation of the lockdown. Conclusions This study provides insight into the impact of the government lockdown policy on an area with extremely low socio-economic status, poor healthcare resources, and highly active cross-border movement. The lockdown had a great impact on reducing individual mobility, including cross-border movement. The quick return to normal mobility after relaxation of the lockdown implies that close monitoring of disease should be continued to prevent a second wave.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.16, No.2 February (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0245842en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85100625626en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/79385
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100625626&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleEffects of COVID-19 government travel restrictions on mobility in a rural border area of Northern Thailand: A mobile phone tracking studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100625626&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections