Publication: The efficacy of a brief intervention to reduce alcohol use in persons with HIV in South Africa, a randomized clinical trial
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19326203
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85071107189
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS ONE. Vol.14, No.8 (2019)
Suggested Citation
Diana Huis in ‘t Veld, Chellafe Ensoy-Musoro, Supa Pengpid, Karl Peltzer, Robert Colebunders The efficacy of a brief intervention to reduce alcohol use in persons with HIV in South Africa, a randomized clinical trial. PLoS ONE. Vol.14, No.8 (2019). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220799 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/49924
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The efficacy of a brief intervention to reduce alcohol use in persons with HIV in South Africa, a randomized clinical trial
Abstract
© 2019 Huis in ‘t Veld et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background Since there is a high prevalence of high risk alcohol use in patients with HIV in Africa, with negative health effects, there is a need for short interventions to reduce alcohol use. Methods We studied the efficacy of a short intervention aiming to reduce alcohol use based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioural Skills Model in patients with HIV with high alcohol use (measured by AUDIT). The study was performed in three outpatient clinics in South Africa. The intervention group received in one-session intervention a personalized feedback on AUDIT results trying to make people aware that they are in the medium- or high-risk drinking category. Both the intervention and the control group received a health education leaflet. Results A total of 560 patients participated in the study with a follow up of 1 year. There was a significant decrease in total AUDIT scores between baseline and follow up points 1 (5 months) and 2 (1 year) in both groups. There was no significant decrease between time points 1 and 2. However, between the intervention and control groups there was no difference in reduction of alcohol use to abstinence or low risk alcohol use over time as there was no difference in absolute decrease in AUDIT-score or percentage of change in AUDIT score. The intervention had no influence on the quality of life outcomes, depression scores, stigma, tobacco use, viral load and therapy adherence at both time points. In all secondary outcomes, there was no significant interaction between intervention and time. Conclusion The brief intervention was not successful at reducing alcohol use both 5 and 12 months after the intervention. However, there was a beneficial effect on reported hazardous or harmful alcohol use at least over a short term follow up period in both study groups. It might be that only an interview and/or the distribution of a health leaflet can be successful in reducing alcohol use but this needs to be investigated with more objective measures of alcohol use. To sustain an effect, most likely repetitive contacts with hazardous or harmful alcohol drinkers will be needed during a long follow up period.